Aleena, Author at TV EDWARDS
TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

The Soho Society’s Decision to Challenge Licence Applications in Westminster

The new licensing landscape could improve and promote equal footing among different types of operators.

Our Services Contact Us
← Back to News & Blogs
15 June 2026
Jade James
Solicitor
Blog Licensing Law

The Decision

The Soho Society is a non-profit organisation established in 1972, which is funded by Westminster Council and aims to “preserve the character of Soho” and protect the interests of residents and businesses in the area. The group retains a formal consultative role to Westminster Council in relation to all planning and licensing applications in Soho.      

Following the group’s annual general meeting in the final week of May 2026, it has made a decision to object to all new licence applications, applications to renew existing licences and applications for venues to stay open beyond “core hours,” which end at 11pm in Westminster. 

With consideration of cumulative impact and licensing objectives, the Soho Society has specified that it will object to: 

  • all applications that wish to trade beyond defined core hours
  • all new applications for betting shops, bars, music, dance and nightclub premises
  • sex shop licences

The Soho Society claims that the decision was made to prevent public nuisance and crime and disorder due to the dense concentration of late-night premises in the Westminster area. However, restaurant and bar owners have expressed concerns that this could undermine the identity of Soho, which is widely considered one of London’s most culturally rich and vibrant neighborhoods. Many have complained that it is difficult to find places to have a meal and drink in central London after 11pm due to the “core hours” policy. Club owners in the area are also reportedly being refused licences to stay open late and are required to close around 1am. 

Furthermore, there have been concerns that the Soho Society’s decision could contribute to a decrease in hospitality jobs and exacerbate the current issue of high levels of youth unemployment in Britain by leading to reduced hours and jobs for young people. 

The Soho Society has been accused of making vexatious and biased complaints in relation to licence applications. Although a spokesperson for the group has stated that its concerns are a reflection of people in the community, the group is estimated to only represent a minor percentage and demographic of the district’s residents. 

The Draft London Strategic Licensing Policy 2026-2031

In February 2026, Sadiq Khan, the Mayor of London, set out a new London-wide Strategic Licensing Policy to boost the capital’s hospitality and nightlife industries. The policy aims to make licensing more transparent and consistent across London and provide new powers to the Mayor through the Licensing Act 2003 (to be amended by the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill).

Currently, all local authorities in England and Wales are required by the Licensing Act 2003 to prepare and publish a Statement of Licensing Policy establishing the principles and guidelines the authority will use when making decisions on licensing applications, highlighting the fragmented nature of the UK’s licensing framework. This means it is easier to acquire or amend a licence in some areas than in others. The new policy will establish principles that the 33 London boroughs will be required to follow when making licensing decisions, reducing licensing inconsistencies and supporting economic growth across the capital. 

The UK’s licensing framework is largely focused on economic growth and high street regeneration and balancing this alongside public safety and the statutory licensing objectives which are prevention of crime and disorder, public safety, prevention of public nuisance and protecting children from harm.  The Revised Guidance issued under Section 182 of the Licensing Act 2003, also imposes a duty on local authorities to have regard to economic growth, stating, “When making licensing decisions, all licensing authorities should consider the need to promote growth and deliver economic benefits”.

The Soho Society’s decision to challenge new licence applications seemingly misaligns with the goals set out in the new licensing policy, which is why it is being met with objections.

The Mayor of London’s Plan to Overrule the Soho Society’s Decision

Most notably, the Mayor of London has vowed to overrule the Soho Society’s plan to object to all new licence applications in Soho. 

The new powers the Mayor will be granted by the government detailed in the Draft London Strategic Licensing Policy 2026-2031 are set to be fully implemented by the summer of 2026. This is significant as it will be the first time the Mayor has a formal strategic role in London’s licensing system. He has stated that he will use these new licensing powers to help “protect venues” and “extend London’s late-night offer”.

Specifically, the Mayor will be consulted by licensing authorities on their Statement of Licensing Policies, be able to overturn decisions to block pubs and bars from opening and be able to determine licence applications.  The Greater London Authority (GLA) is also being added as a responsible authority that can intervene in licensing decisions, and the Mayor will have the power to “call-in” or review applications in areas that are deemed to be of strategic importance to the night-time economy. This would permit bars to stay open later and increase al-fresco dining in Soho during the summertime. Al fresco dining is currently limited as the Soho Society and other residents took issue with its prominence following the pandemic.   

The new licensing landscape could improve and promote equal footing among different types of operators, as Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) and grassroots organisations are reported to be disproportionately burdened by the current system. There could also be a shift to abolish cumulative impact assessments (CIAs), which are tools that licensing authorities use to identify specific geographic zones where the high concentration of licensed premises negatively affects the local area. Furthermore, it could lead to responsibility for noise nuisance mitigation being placed on residential developers who build near existing hospitality venues.

Ultimately, these policy changes could make it easier for premises to acquire and amend licences and also prevent the imposition of blanket conditions and “core hours” policies, as each application will be assessed on its own merit.

How Our Licensing Solicitors Can Help

We provide comprehensive advice and representation on all aspects of licensing policies and licence applications:

We can help you by:

  • Reviewing and interpreting local authority licensing policies
  • Advising on how policies affect your application
  • Preparing compliant and strategically structured licence applications
  • Representing you in licensing hearings and negotiations
  • Justifying applications that deviate from licensing policies
  • Helping protect your licence from review or revocation

We act for a wide range of businesses, including restaurants, bars, pubs, nightclubs, event venues, and hospitality operators.  Our solicitors routinely deal with contested applications in Soho and across London, and are specialists in negotiating with responsible authorities, residents’ associations and neighbouring properties to seek a compromise and ensure a suitably licence is obtained.

Why Choose TV Edwards?

  • Highly ranked in legal directories – Legal 500 and Chambers UK 
  • Immediate emergency support – call us on 0203 440 8000
  • Specialist representation – police station advisers, solicitors, and higher court advocates
  • Hardworking problem-solvers – we fearlessly challenge evidence, protecting your interests
  • Honest and down-to-earth – we explain your options compassionately and in plain English
Related Services:
Licensing Solicitors
TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

Cohabitation Reform 2026: The Current Position and the Government Consultation

The 2026 consultation marks a potentially transformative moment in the development of family law in England and Wales

Our Services Contact Us
← Back to News & Blogs
8 June 2026
Mandeep Bhachu
Solicitor
Blog Family

The law relating to cohabiting couples in England and Wales has long been criticised for failing to reflect modern family life. With many couples choosing to live together without getting married or entering a civil partnership, pressure has increased on governments to reform a legal framework that many commentators regard as outdated.

In June 2026, the government launched a consultation on cohabitation reform, indicating the most significant review of cohabitants’ rights in a generation. The consultation seeks views on how greater legal protection can be provided to unmarried couples whilst maintaining the distinct legal status of marriage and civil partnership.

The Current Legal Position

Under the current law of England and Wales, cohabiting couples do not enjoy the same legal rights and responsibilities as married couples or civil partners. Despite the belief in the concept of a “common law marriage”, no such legal status exists. The fact that a couple has lived together for many years does not automatically give either party rights to the other’s property, pension, savings or income upon separation.

When a cohabiting relationship breaks down, disputes concerning property ownership are generally determined by property law rather than family law. A partner who is not a legal owner of the family home may have to establish a beneficial interest through complex trust law claims, often involving arguments about financial contributions or shared intentions. Litigation in this respect can be expensive, uncertain and difficult to pursue.

Limited remedies are available where children are involved. Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989 permits applications for financial provision for children, including housing arrangements, but these claims are focused on the child’s needs rather than providing long term financial support for the former partner.

The position following death is also different from that of married couples. Cohabiting partners do not automatically inherit under the intestacy rules. Unless a valid will exists, a surviving partner may need to pursue a claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependents) Act 1975.

The 2026 Consultation

The government’s 2026 consultation represents a significant policy shift. The consultation seeks views on strengthening the legal rights of cohabiting couples while preserving marriage as a distinct legal institution.

Although the consultation process remains ongoing, reports indicate that the government is considering an opt-out framework under which certain cohabiting couples would become eligible for legal protection after meeting certain criteria. Proposed eligibility requirements may include living together for a minimum period, such as three years, or having a child together. Courts would also need to be satisfied that the parties were in an enduring family relationship.

The consultation explores whether eligible cohabitants should be able to seek financial remedies upon separation, including claims relating to property and other assets. It also considers whether surviving cohabitants should receive greater protection following the death of a partner, particularly in cases where no valid will exists.

Another significant aspect of the consultation concerns domestic abuse. The government has indicated that any future framework may take account of coercive and controlling behaviour, economic abuse and other forms of domestic abuse when determining financial outcomes. This reflects broader developments in family law and an increasing recognition of non-physical forms of abuse within intimate relationships.

Conclusion

The 2026 consultation marks a potentially transformative moment in the development of family law in England and Wales. For many years legal reform has lagged behind changing social patterns and family structures.

No new laws have been formally passed as of yet. Unmarried couples still lack the automatic financial and property protections granted to married couples or civil partners. To bridge this gap many family solicitors encourage unmarried couples to put a cohabitation agreement in place, formalising property ownership status (e.g. specifying joint tenants versus tenants in common) as interim protection.

The current law provides limited protection for cohabiting couples and often produces outcomes that are perceived as unfair, particularly where one partner has suffered economic disadvantage during the relationship.

The government has now prioritised long overdue changes. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and the Law Commission are focusing on key areas that would reshape family law. The proposed legal changes are statutory financial schemes, transitional maintenance, bereavement and inheritance and legally binding cohabitation agreements.

While the final shape of the legislation remains uncertain, the consultation demonstrates a clear willingness by the government to revisit a long-standing area of concern. Whether reform ultimately takes the form of an opt-out scheme, enhanced inheritance rights, financial remedies on separation, or a combination of these measures, the outcome is likely to have significant implications for many cohabiting couples.  The consultation therefore represents an important opportunity to shape the future legal framework governing modern family relationships.

How can we help?

If you are living with a partner and would like advice on your current legal position, our family law team can help. Whether you are considering a cohabitation agreement, reviewing property ownership arrangements, or seeking guidance on your rights following separation, we can provide clear and practical advice tailored to your circumstances.

Contact us today to discuss your situation with one of our specialist family solicitors on 0203 400 8000 or email us at family@tvedwards.com.

Related Services:
Cohabitation Agreement Solicitors Family Finance Solicitors Family Law Solicitors
TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

Navigating the Licensing Act 2003: A Guide for Hospitality, Leisure & Retail Businesses

Licensing authorities and holders of a licence under the Licensing Act 2003 have a duty to actively promote and have regard to the four licensing objectives

Our Services Contact Us
← Back to News & Blogs
26 May 2026
Jade James
Solicitor
Blog Licensing Law

Securing the correct license authorisations under the Licensing Act 2003 is the critical first step for any hospitality, leisure or retail venture in England and Wales. Failure to comply with the relevant legislation and regulations can result in severe legal penalties, unlimited fines, or the closure of your business.

What are Licensable Activities?

Part 1 of the Licensing Act 2003 governs local authority authorisation.  These include:

  • The sale or supply of alcohol (on or off the premises)
  • Regulated entertainment (including plays, films, indoor sporting events, boxing/wrestling and certain live/recorded music performances)
  • Late-night refreshment (the provision of hot food or drink, consumed on or off the premises, between the hours of 23:00 and 05:00)

*Note that the Live Music Act 2012 and the Legislative Reform (Entertainment Licensing) Order 2014 (which amended the Licensing Act 2003) deregulated most live and recorded music performances between 08:00 and 23:00 for audiences of up to 500 people in venues licensed for the sale of alcohol.

The types of businesses that may require licences to operate include:

  • Pubs
  • Bars
  • Restaurants
  • Nightclubs
  • Off-licences
  • Hotels and guest houses
  • Private members clubs
  • Social clubs
  • Sports venues
  • Cinemas
  • Theatres
  • Amateur dramatic groups
  • Community groups
  • Youth clubs
  • Entertainment organisers

The Four Licensing Objectives

Licensing authorities and holders of a licence under the Licensing Act 2003 have a duty to actively promote and have regard to the four licensing objectives, which are at the heart of the licensing regime. These objectives are:

  • The prevention of crime and disorder
  • Public safety
  • The prevention of public nuisance
  • The protection of children from harm

Key Types of Authorisations

Premises Licence – A permanent license granted in respect of a specific location such as a pub, restaurant, nightclub or shop, which authorises the licence holder to carry out licensable activities.  The licence will only become invalid if the holder dies, loses capacity, loses their right to work, bankruptcy/insolvency, revocation or voluntary surrender. An annual fee is payable on the anniversary of the grant of each licence.  There must be an appointed Designated Premises Supervisor (DPS) if alcohol will be sold at a premises. 

Personal Licence – Required for individuals who wish to authorise the sale of alcohol where a Premises License is in force.  Any premises selling alcohol must have a named DPS who holds a Personal License.  The license is valid indefinitely and is not tied to a specific premises. A personal licence holder must meet certain criteria such as passing an accredited alcohol licensing qualification and undergoing a criminal background check.  

Club Premises Certificate – A certificate only available to qualifying members’ clubs such as sports clubs, permitting them to carry out licensable activities. Premises with this certificate are exempt from having to name a DPS.  

Temporary Event Notice (TEN) – A notice that is required for one-off events involving licensable activities such as weddings, festivals, pop-up events or for extending the activities of a pre-existing Premises Licence for special events.  The event can only last for a maximum of 7 days and there must be no more than 499 people on site at any time.

The Licensing Application Process

The process of obtaining a licence is governed by strict statutory timelines. Navigating these stages correctly is vital to avoid delays that can postpone your business launch.

Pre-Application and Evidence Gathering

Prior to submitting a licence application, the required documents and evidence must be gathered, such as a detailed premises plan, which must be drawn to scale and compliant with the Licensing Act 2003 and Section 182 Guidance, an operating schedule (part of the licence application) which outlines activities and precisely how the four licensing objectives will be promoted and right to work documents in accordance with requirements under the Immigration Act 2016.

Submission and Consultation Period

Once an application in relation to a venue or event is submitted to the licensing authority, copies of the application must be sent to the Responsible Authorities (such as the Police, Fire Authority, and Environmental Health, etc) on the same day. If you apply electronically, the licensing authority often automatically forwards the forms to the Responsible Authorities, but this is different with paper/postal applications.

A blue notice must be displayed at the premises the day after the application is submitted, and a notice must be published in a local newspaper within 10 working days starting on the day after the application is submitted. There will then be a consultation period during which the Responsible Authorities and members of the public can make representations (objections) in respect of the application. Representations must directly relate to one or more of the four statutory licensing objectives and cannot be frivolous, vexatious or repetitious.

Conflict Resolution and Mediation

Applicants can liaise with a party who makes a valid representation to reach an agreement and prompt them to withdraw their representation by proposing to add conditions to the licence which will address the concerns raised.   

Sub-Committee Hearing

If no agreement can be reached, the licensing authority will arrange for a sub-committee hearing to take place to address the issues and determine whether the business the application relates to will promote the statutory licensing objectives.  

*Note that unlike applications for Premises Licences or Club Premises Certificates, the process for a Personal Licence is focused solely on the applicant’s eligibility. 

Consequently, there is no requirement to display a public blue notice at a premises or to publish a notice in a local newspaper. Instead, the process is centered on the submission of accredited qualifications and valid criminal record disclosures to the relevant licensing authority.  Temporary Event Notices are also not subject to public consultation and do not require press advertising.

Why the Application Process is Challenging

The licensing application process can be complex, due to a variety of different factors. 

Evidentiary Burden

Key documents must be provided alongside the application.  For applications that relate to a venue or event, the operating schedule which forms part of the application is required to detail how the licensing objectives will be promoted, site plans that comply with the Licensing Act 2003 and Section 182 Guidance must be submitted and right to work evidence must also be provided.  

Fragmented Local Frameworks

Each licensing authority is required to determine and publish its own Statement of Licensing Policy, which is tailored to address the specific community needs, geography and challenges of a particular borough or district.  This means that there are inconsistencies across rules and the general licensing legal system.

Cumulative Impact Zones

Making a licensing application for a venue or event in a cumulative impact zone means facing a rebuttal presumption of refusal, as local authorities will automatically assume that the application will be refused.  These zones are designated areas where a local authority has identified that the number, type, or density of licensed premises is contributing to crime, disorder or public nuisance and therefore, the burden is on the applicant to evidence that their business will not add to existing issues if they are granted a licence.

Objections

There is a risk that an application for a licence for a venue or event could receive representations from Responsible Authorities or members of the public. Thus, the applicant is responsible for demonstrating that their application promotes the statutory licensing objectives.  If the application goes to a local licensing committee for a hearing, this can delay opening dates, lead to the imposition of strict conditions or lead to the rejection of the application by the licensing authority.  

Completion of Operating Schedules

The operating schedule is a document in a licensing application that outlines the proposed licensable activities, opening hours and how the applicant intends to promote the statutory licensing objectives. Therefore, applicants need to find a balance between proposing enough suitable conditions to satisfy authorities without imposing overly restrictive rules that impact the operational flexibility of their business, as they will need to comply with all conditions of the licence.

How Our Licensing Solicitors Can Help

We provide comprehensive advice and representation on all aspects of licensing policies and licence applications:

We can help you by:

  • Reviewing and interpreting local authority licensing policies
  • Advising on how policies affect your application
  • Preparing compliant and strategically structured licence applications
  • Representing you in licensing hearings and negotiations
  • Justifying applications that deviate from licensing policies
  • Helping protect your licence from review or revocation

We act for a wide range of businesses, including restaurants, bars, pubs, nightclubs, event venues, and hospitality operators. 

Why Choose TV Edwards?

  • Highly ranked in legal directories – Legal 500 and Chambers UK 
  • Immediate emergency support – call us on  0203 440 8000
  • Specialist representation – police station advisers, solicitors, and higher court advocates
  • Hardworking problem-solvers – we fearlessly challenge evidence, protecting your interests
  • Honest and down-to-earth – we explain your options compassionately and in plain English
Related Services:
Licensing Solicitors
TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

A brief history of divorce in England

Divorce is an emotionally and legally significant time, but with the right support, it does not need to be contentious or confusing.

Our Services Contact Us
← Back to News & Blogs
14 May 2026
Katja Trela-Larsen
Solicitor
Blog Divorce and Family Finance

Over time, and through incremental legal reforms, divorce law has adapted to meet changing societal expectations, the following is whistle stop tour of the landmark changes in divorce law in England from medieval times to present day.

Ecclesiastical courts

Famously, the Catholic Church refused to allow King Henry VIII to end his marriage to his first wife, Katherine of Aragon which led to the founding of the Church of England in 1534.

The rhyme used to recall the fate of King Henry the VIII’s wives goes: divorced, decapitated, died, divorced, decapitated, survived. In actuality, Henry’s marriages to Katherine of Aragon and Anne of Cleves were annulled by archbishops of the Church of England.  

Divorce by Acts of Parliament

Before the mid-19th century the only way of obtaining a full divorce, which allowed re-marriage, was by a Private Act of Parliament.

The first English true divorce, rather than an ecclesiastical separation, between John Manners, Lord Roos, and Lady Anne Roos (nee Pierpoint), was granted by an Act of Parliament in 1670 on the grounds of the wife’s adultery.

The process of divorce by Act of Parliament was complex and largely only open to wealthy and powerful male petitioners.

While men could divorce on the ground of adultery, women additionally had to prove incestuous adultery or bigamy.

The first divorce to be obtained by a woman in England and Wales was in 1801 when Jane Campbell divorced her husband Edward Addison on the grounds of adultery with her sister, under the Addison/Campbell Divorce Act.

Matrimonial Causes Act 1857

The 1857 Matrimonial Causes Act allowed ordinary people to divorce. Under this law, women divorcing on the grounds of adultery not only had to prove their husbands had been unfaithful but also had to prove additional faults, which included cruelty, rape and incest.

The Matrimonial Causes Act 1923, introduced as a private member’s bill, enabled women to divorce on the basis of their spouse’s adultery without the requirement for additional faults (as men had been able to since 1857).

In 1937 divorce was allowed on other grounds including drunkenness, insanity and desertion.

Divorce remained uncommon enough to be a potential source of shame through to the first half of the 20th century. 

Divorce Reform Act 1969

The Divorce Reform Act 1969 changed the law so a marriage could be ended if it had irretrievably broken down, provided one of five grounds could be proved. The breakdown of the marriage needed to be evidenced with proof of adultery, unreasonable behaviour, desertion, two years separation with the consent of both parties, or five years separation if only one party consented to the divorce.

The Matrimonial Causes Act of 1973 consolidated previous enactments relating to matrimonial proceedings. A marriage could be ended if it had irretrievably broken down, provided one of five grounds could be proved, as before, three grounds required fault and the other two were based on periods of separation.

Divorce Dissolution and Separation Act 2020

The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 amended the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 allowing married couples to divorce without evidencing the breakdown of the marriage.

Since 6 April 2022, instead of relying on fault or separation, an application for divorce states that the marriage has broken down irretrievably and this does not have to be proved.

The advantage to this procedure is that it encourages a non-contentious approach to the divorce process. It also makes it harder for the other spouse to stop the divorce happening by contesting it as the divorce will go ahead even if they do not agree the marriage has broken down irretrievably.

Need help with your divorce

Divorce is an emotionally and legally significant time, but with the right support, it does not need to be contentious or confusing. Our Divorce solicitors have specialist experience of helping thousands of people through the process. We are passionate about the work do and are committed to provide exceptional client service to get you the best possible outcome in often stressful circumstances.

Get in touch with our Family Divorce and Finance team on 0203 440 8000 or email family@tvedwards.com to discuss how we can support you.

Related Services:
Divorce Solicitors Family Finance Solicitors
TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

Avoiding a criminal conviction for young people

Encouraging non-judgmental conversations with your child about their school or social life could embolden them to open up.

Our Services Contact Us
← Back to News & Blogs
27 April 2026
Talal Husseini
Paralegal
Blog Criminal Defence

Avoiding a criminal conviction for young people (aged 10-17) by diverting them away from prosecution is the starting point for the youth justice system. The key bodies involved in youth justice should all be working against the unnecessary criminalisation of children. This is based on evidence that a ‘Child First’ diversionary approach is more likely to prevent offending than formal prosecution.

In this article I will explain the types of out of court resolutions that are available to children, how they relate to specific offences, and how parents and defence lawyers should engage with the police and prosecutors to help young people avoid conviction.

Formal resolutions

Youth cautions and youth conditional cautions are the most common formal out of court resolutions. Formal means that they form part of a young person’s criminal record.  

Youth cautions

For the police to issue a youth caution there must be sufficient evidence to charge the child, the child must admit guilt, and the officer in charge of the case must be satisfied that the child should not be prosecuted.

Youth cautions should be issued as soon as practicable, and the police must refer the child to the Youth Justice Service (YJS) who will assess them and confirm that a caution is the most appropriate disposal.

Youth conditional cautions

Youth conditional cautions require that a child complies with certain conditions to facilitate rehabilitation, repair the wrong caused or punish the child in an informal way. These should be appropriate, proportionate and achievable. They should only impose what’s necessary and avoid unrealistic demands on the child.

Financial penalties (max. £100) must consider the child’s ability to pay. Other conditions may involve working with the council to right a wrong (e.g. clean up graffiti) or work with a social worker to help prevent reoffending. Conditions cannot last more than 16 weeks from the date the caution was imposed for low-level offences and ideally should not exceed 20 weeks for more serious offences, subject to appropriateness.

Failing to comply with conditions of a youth conditional caution can lead to warnings, may stay on the child’s record, or in the most serious cases may lead to prosecution for the original offence. However, the police are expected to try to avoid this by encouraging compliance.

Informal resolutions

Informal resolutions usually do not form part of a child’s criminal record and can be offered for very low-level offences committed by first-time offenders. The most common types include:

  • Community resolution order – designed for low-level offences such as illegal graffiti or drug possession. The child need only accept responsibility for the offence and be prepared to complete any agreed intervention (e.g. issue an apology, clean graffiti or attend a drugs meeting).
  • Triage – accompanied with No Further Action outcome. Local police forces decide how to administer triage but it usually involves the child speaking with a police officer or the Youth Justice Service about why their actions were wrong and how to avoid reoffending.
  • Outcome 22 – designed for when a rehabilitative or educational intervention activity has taken place and it is no longer in the public interest to take further action.

Serious offences

Technically, an out of court resolution can be considered even for serious offences. Calculating whether an out of court resolution is appropriate to a specific young person’s situation is governed by the Child Gravity Matrix, which takes into account aggravating and mitigating factors that guide police officers towards or away from prosecution.  

Knife crime is a prevalent issue today that would normally warrant prosecution. For adults, possession of a knife in a public place carries a sentencing starting point of 6 months’ imprisonment. For a first-time knife offence, avoiding conviction may be vital to a child’s future, such as preserving future job prospects.

The guidelines state that a youth conditional caution should be the starting point for any child under 16 provided it’s their first time and the offence is no more serious than simple possession (e.g. they haven’t tried to use or threaten anyone with the knife). A youth conditional caution is also available for those aged 16 to 17, but exceptional mitigating circumstances must exist. These may include underlying mental health issues, exploitation, persistent bullying, or peer pressure. A good defence lawyer will discover and advance those exceptional circumstances.  

The commission of sexual offences by children is not uncommon. Intense hormones and inexperience can blur the lines between sexual experimentation and  a criminal offence. Out of court resolutions in this respect can avoid prosecution of a child which would otherwise impact them for the rest of their lives. However, accepting a formal resolution can still lead to the child being placed on the sex offender register and all options must be considered before a child accepts a caution for a sexual offence.

Tips for parents/guardians

It can be distressing for a parent/guardian of a child accused of a crime, who must work with the defence lawyer by providing information about their child’s situation which could help them to avoid conviction. Understandably, children in custody are often unwilling to speak to strangers about their underlying issues that resulted in offending. Statistically this is more true for children from minority ethnic backgrounds or looked after children who may have already felt let down by the system, leading to a lack of trust in authority figures or adults in general.

Encouraging non-judgmental conversations with your child about their school or social life could embolden them to open up, unearthing those mitigating factors that could be the difference between conviction and diversion.

Good defence lawyers should:

  • Engage with parents/guardians at the police station to discover information about the child’s mental health issues, school and home life.
  • Familiarise themselves with the Child Gravity Matrix so they know what to look for when considering a child’s situation.
  • Make representations to the police and Crown Prosecution Service as early as possible to incentivise diversion over prosecution.

A word of warning

While accepting an out of court resolution will often be a positive alternative to prosecution, a young person’s decision to admit guilt shouldn’t be taken lightly. Defence lawyers will help the child to consider the evidence against them and always advise in their best interest. A parent of a child who maintains their innocence should not be afraid to take the case to trial. Accepting an out of court resolution just to avoid court proceedings will never be acceptable course of action.

Formal resolutions such as cautions can also be disclosed by the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) which may affect future job applications. They can be barrier to travel to certain countries, and can be used as evidence during family law proceedings or immigration applications.

How can we help

Our experienced Crime team can provide early advice, represent your child at police interviews and in youth court, and ensure that your child’s interests are protected to produce a more favourable outcome.

Contact us for a free, no obligation initial discussion on 020 3440 8000 or email enquiries@tvedwards.com.  

Disclaimer: The information on the TV Edwards website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication.

Related Services:
Criminal Defence Solicitors
TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

The Renters’ Rights Act 2025: What Landlords Need to Know

This change is expected to provide greater security for tenants

Our Services Contact Us
← Back to News & Blogs
14 April 2026
TV Edwards Blog
Blog Dispute Resolution

The Renters’ Rights Act 2025 (“RRA 2025”) introduces significant reforms to the private rented sector in England. The aim is to improve security for tenants, raise housing standards and create a more transparent and accountable system for landlords.

This article provides an overview of the key changes and what they mean in practice.

Who Does the Act Apply To?

The RRA 2025 primarily affects the private rented sector in England. It applies to:

  • Private landlords;
  • Private registered providers of social housing;
  • Providers of supported accommodation;
  • Landlords offering temporary accommodation on behalf of local authorities.

Importantly, the RRA 2025 does not apply to local authority secure tenancies. While the legislation has limited impact in Wales, the main reforms are focused on England.

When Do the Changes Take Effect?

The reforms are being introduced in stages.

Some provisions came into force on 27 December 2025, however the most significant changes are expected from 1 May 2026. These include the end of “no fault” evictions, changes to tenancy structures and new tenant protections as explained within this article.

Further measures, such as a landlord ombudsman and a national landlord database are expected later in 2026, with additional reforms extending into 2027 and beyond.

The End of Fixed-Term Tenancies

One of the most fundamental changes is the abolition of fixed-term assured tenancies.

All new tenancies will become periodic (rolling) tenancies. This means:

  • Tenancies will continue indefinitely until ended by either the landlord or the tenant;
  • Rent periods must be monthly or for a period of less than 28 days; 
  • Fixed-term clauses will no longer have legal effect.

Existing tenancies will automatically convert to periodic tenancies once the relevant provisions come into force on 1st May 2026.

Abolition of “No Fault” Evictions

The RRA 2025 removes the provision which previously allowed landlords to use section 21 of the Housing Act 1988 to evict tenants without giving a reason.

Going forwards, landlords will only be able to recover possession by relying on specific legal grounds, serving a relevant and correctly drafted section 8 notice and obtaining a court order. Such grounds include matters such as rent arrears, anti-social behaviour or the landlord’s intention to sell or occupy the property.

This change is expected to provide greater security for tenants but it also means landlords must ensure they can evidence a valid reason when seeking possession.

Changes to Possession Grounds

Whilst “no fault” evictions are being abolished, the RRA 2025 expands and amends the existing grounds for possession.

Landlords will still be able to recover their property in defined circumstances but the process will be more structured. Courts will expect clear evidence and in many cases, possession will no longer be automatic.

There are also new safeguards. For example, landlords must generally comply with deposit protection rules and to register on a national database before the court will grant possession (although this latter protection is not expected to come into force until late 2026/early 2027).

Instructing a solicitor to advise on the new grounds for possession under the RRA 2025 is increasingly important for landlords because the legal landscape has shifted in a way that leaves far less room for error.

With the abolition of “no fault” evictions, landlords can no longer rely on a straightforward route to recover possession. Instead, every claim must now be based on a specific statutory ground and crucially, that ground must be properly evidenced and proven in court. This creates a more technical and in many cases, more demanding process.

A solicitor can help ensure that the correct ground is identified from the outset. Many of the revised and newly introduced grounds have detailed requirements, including notice periods, evidential thresholds and restrictions on when they can be used. Selecting the wrong ground or misunderstanding how it operates can lead to a claim being dismissed, cause delay, additional cost and potential loss of rental income.

New Rules on Rent Increases

The RRA 2025 introduces tighter controls on how and when rent can be increased.

Landlords will no longer be able to rely on rent review clauses in tenancy agreements. Instead, rent increases must follow a statutory process, typically requiring formal notice and giving tenants the opportunity to challenge increases through the First-Tier Tribunal.

In most cases, rent can only be increased once per year and arguably, tenants will have stronger rights to dispute excessive increases.

Ban on Rental Bidding

New rules introduced by the RRA 2025 will prohibit landlords from inviting or accepting offers above the advertised rent.

This is intended to create a fairer and more transparent market by preventing competitive bidding between prospective tenants.

We believe this will have particular effect on the residential rental market in London where demand is high and competition for well-presented properties is strong.

Landlords will therefore be well advised to carefully consider the rental market in the area their property is located before advertising the rental price of residential properties in the future.

Tenant Protection Against Discrimination

The RRA 2025 makes it unlawful for landlords to discriminate against prospective tenants because they:

  • Have children; or
  • Receive benefits.

Blanket bans such as “no DSS” or “no families” will no longer be permitted, except in limited circumstances where justification can be made, for example due to insurance requirements.

Tenants’ Right to Request a Pet

Tenants will have a new legal right to request permission to keep a pet. Such requests must be made in writing and contain a description of the pet.

Landlords must consider such requests and cannot unreasonably refuse them. Decisions must be made within a set timeframe and provided in writing.

This change reflects a shift towards greater flexibility in rental living, although landlords may still refuse where there is a valid reason.

What a ‘valid reason’ might be will likely depend heavily on the circumstances and we would suggest that landlords seek specialist legal advice on this point.

New Duties on Landlords, Stronger Enforcement and Penalties

The RRA 2025 introduces additional responsibilities for landlords, including a requirement to provide a written statement of key tenancy terms and information before the tenancy begins.

Failure to comply with these obligations can result in financial penalties. Local authorities will have strengthened enforcement powers, including the ability to investigate and issue fines.

Landlords who fail to comply with their obligations may face substantial financial penalties and in some cases, criminal liability. Rent repayment orders may also be made, requiring landlords to repay rent to tenants where certain offences have been committed.

In short, the strengthened enforcement regime means that compliance is no longer simply best practice, it is essential. Instructing a solicitor helps landlords navigate the new requirements with confidence, reduce risk and protect their position.

Introduction of a Landlord Ombudsman and Database

Further reforms include the creation of:

  • A national landlord redress scheme (often referred to as a Landlord Ombudsman);
  • A private rented sector database.

Landlords will be required to register and remain compliant. Failure to do so may result in penalties and could prevent landlords from regaining possession of their property.

It should be noted however, that these reforms are not expected to come into force until late 2026.

Improved Housing Standards

The legislation will extend key housing standards to the private rented sector, including:

  • The Decent Homes Standard;
  • “Awaab’s Law”, requiring landlords to investigate and resolve serious health hazards such as damp and mould within set timeframes.

These measures are designed to ensure safer and more habitable rental properties although these particular changes are not expected to be implemented until late 2026/early 2027.

What This Means in Practice

The RRA 2025 represents one of the most significant overhauls of the law governing the residential rental market in recent decades.

For tenants, it offers increased security, stronger protections and greater transparency.

For landlords, it introduces stricter compliance requirements and a more regulated environment.

It will therefore be important for landlords to understand their rights and obligations carefully as the reforms come into force.

How We Can Help

The changes introduced by the RRA 2025 are complex and will affect tenancy agreements, possession procedures and compliance requirements for landlords.

If you are a landlord and would like advice on how these reforms apply to your tenancies past, present or future, our specialist Dispute Resolution team can provide clear, practical advice to help landlords navigate these changes with confidence.

We assist with possession claims, including identifying the correct grounds, ensuring compliance with the new requirements and representing landlords where disputes arise. We also advise on regulatory obligations to minimise the risk of penalties, enforcement action and rent repayment orders, helping to protect your position.

Get in touch with our Dispute Resolution team on 0203 440 8000 or email adam.haffenden@tvedwards.com to discuss how we can support you.

Disclaimer: The information on the TV Edwards website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication.

TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

Running the Hackney Half Marathon for Samaritans: Why It Matters to Me as a Junior Solicitor

April is Stress Awareness Month and a reminder to prioritise mental wellbeing, especially in the legal profession.

Our Services Contact Us
← Back to News & Blogs
8 April 2026
TV Edwards Blog
Blog Dispute Resolution

In May 2026, I will be taking on the Hackney Half Marathon in support of Samaritans, a charity that provides vital emotional support to people experiencing distress or crisis. As a junior solicitor in civil litigation, this is a cause that resonates with me not only on a personal level but also in the context of my professional life.

I am an avid runner, having enjoyed the sport since an early age and hope to beat my current personal best of 1 hour 47 minutes on race day. Whilst the challenge itself is important to me, the motivation behind it is even more significant.

Mental Health in the Legal Profession

The legal profession is widely recognised as demanding and at times, emotionally challenging. Long hours, high expectations and the nature of the work can place considerable pressure on solicitors at all stages of their careers, particularly those who are newly qualified.

I feel that supporting Samaritans is one way of contributing to a broader conversation about mental health within the profession. Their work helps to ensure that anyone struggling has access to a listening ear, free from judgement. By raising funds and awareness, I hope to play a small part in reducing stigma and encouraging more open discussions about mental wellbeing among legal professionals.

Supporting Clients Beyond the Legal Issue

Working in civil litigation often involves engaging with individuals at difficult points in their lives. Whether the matter relates to personal disputes, housing issues or other sensitive circumstances, clients can be under significant emotional strain.

Samaritans provides a service that complements, in many ways, the support solicitors aim to offer their clients. While we advise on legal rights and remedies, organisations like Samaritans are there to support individuals emotionally through challenging times.

I believe that fundraising for this charity is therefore not only about giving back to the community but also about recognising the broader needs of those we work with.

Professional Responsibility and Giving Back

As solicitors, we are in a position of trust and responsibility. Supporting charitable causes is one way of demonstrating a commitment to the wider community and to issues that extend beyond our immediate work.

By fundraising for Samaritans, I hope to contribute to a cause that has a tangible and positive impact. It also reflects values that are central to the legal profession and my own personal morality; empathy, integrity and a commitment to supporting others.

A Personal Challenge with a Purpose

Training for a half marathon requires discipline, consistency and resilience which are qualities that are equally important in legal practice. Setting a goal to improve on my personal best adds an extra layer of motivation but the real focus is on raising funds and awareness for an important cause.

Fundraising has also been a rewarding experience in itself. It provides an opportunity to connect with colleagues, friends and clients and to be part of a collective effort to support a meaningful organisation, all things which are particularly important to me.

While writing this article and reflecting on how I maintain my mental health in such a demanding profession, I realised it would be a valuable opportunity to connect with my colleagues at TV Edwards. I was keen to learn how others look after their mental wellbeing and to gather any tips or suggestions they might be willing to share.

Many colleagues were generous in sharing what works for them and it was really reassuring and insightful to see the variety of ways people prioritise their mental health. Some of their suggestions included:

“Wild water swimming! I love that no one can contact me for that hour and it really resets me on a Saturday morning for the weekend.”

“I am also a runner and find exercise is amazing for clearing my head and sorting out my stresses.”

“Feeling overwhelmed? Try this – pause and zoom out. Picture the Earth turning in the vast universe. Your problems are still real but also small in the grand scheme. Sometimes that shift in perspective is enough to help you take the next step and make a problem seem more manageable.”

“Swimming is wonderful for my mental health. No matter how stressed I am, I am always calmer after a swim. Outdoor swimming is even better.”

“Yoga and sound baths!”

“Most lunchtimes whether I am working from home or at the office, I’ll go for a run. Partly a practical thing because it’s harder to find time in the evening around the kids, but it also breaks the day up and makes the afternoon much easier to tackle.”

“A hot chocolate in the sunshine!”

Thank you to those that shared their thoughts with me!

Why Samaritans?

Samaritans operates a 24/7 service for anyone who needs someone to talk to, offering confidential, non-judgemental support. At a time when conversations around mental health are increasingly important, their work remains as vital as ever.

In both our professional and personal lives, we will all encounter moments of difficulty. Knowing that there is somewhere to turn can make a significant difference. Supporting Samaritans helps to ensure that this service continues to be available to those who need it most.

Disclaimer: The information on the TV Edwards website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication.

Related Services:
Dispute Resolution Solicitors
TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

World Book Day 2026: Stories That Help Children Navigate Family Change

Reading together can provide comfort, structure, and a safe space for exploring feelings.

Our Services Contact Us
← Back to News & Blogs
5 March 2026
Alia Lewis
Partner - Head of Public Law Children
Anesha Pavaday
Associate Solicitor
Blog Children Law Divorce and Family Finance Family

World Book Day is more than just dressing up as your favourite character — it’s a celebration of the power of stories. For children experiencing changes in their family, reading together can be a comforting and meaningful way to make sense of their world.

As family lawyers, we often guide parents through separation, divorce, or blended family arrangements. But beyond legal advice, one of the most powerful tools parents have is the simple act of reading with their children. Books can help children understand change, express emotions, and feel reassured that they are not alone.

Why Reading Together Matters

Reading is not just an enjoyable activity – it builds connection, promotes communication, and encourages understanding. For children who are neurodivergent, reading can be especially transformative. One of our lawyers, Partner and Head of Public Law Children Alia Lewis, shares her experience with her 11-year-old son who is autistic.

Orson didn’t begin to develop verbal communication until age six and reading together was initially challenging. Over time, rhyming stories by authors such as Julia Donaldson captured his attention, helping him anticipate words, participate in the story, and gradually develop reading skills. Today, he reads independently, and their shared reading moments continue to nurture connection, understanding, and curiosity.

This story highlights a universal truth: all children, regardless of how they communicate, absorb and understand far more than we often realise. Reading together is a small act that can provide comfort, structure, and a safe space for exploring feelings.

Books to Support Children Through Family Change

Children’s books that address changing family dynamics can be a wonderful conversation starter. Some age-appropriate recommendations include:

Under 7s

  • My Family’s Changing – Pat Thomas
  • Ms Cliff the Climber – Allan Ahlberg
  • Living with Mum and Living with Dad – Melanie Walsh

7 to 11s

  • One Mum Too Many – Anne Bryant
  • The Lottie Project – Jacqueline Wilson
  • I Cosmo – Carlie Sorosiak

11+

  • It’s Not the End of the World – Judy Blume
  • The Suitcase Kid – Jacqueline Wilson
  • Step by Wicked Step – Ann Fine

For children who enjoy rhymes and illustrations, stories such as Room on the Broom, Zog, A Squash and a Squeeze, The Gruffalo, Snail and the Whale, and Bear Shaped by Dawn Coulter-Cruttenden (about a young autistic boy coping with the loss of his teddy) are excellent choices.

Creating Comfort, Connection, and Conversation

World Book Day reminds us to pause, share a story, and connect. Reading together gives children a safe way to explore their emotions, while giving parents a tool to foster understanding, empathy, and joy. It’s a small ritual with a profound impact, especially during times of change.

Whether your child is neurodivergent or neurotypical, these shared moments can build reassurance, spark conversation, and create memories that last a lifetime.

How We Can Help

Family transitions can be challenging. Our specialists are here to provide guidance on child arrangements, relocation, divorce, or separation. Contact us at 020 3440 8000 or email family@tvedwards.com to speak to a family law professional who understands both the legal and emotional journey of family life.

Alia Lewis specialises in representing and protecting the rights of neurodivergent and vulnerable clients, bringing both professional expertise and a deep understanding of the unique challenges these families may face.

Related Services:
Family Law Solicitors Child Arrangements Solicitors Child Relocation Solicitors Child Law Solicitors Divorce Solicitors
TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

International Women’s Day 2026 – “Rights. Justice. Action. For ALL Women and Girls”

Reflection on the impact of temporary homeless accommodation on women.

Our Services Contact Us
← Back to News & Blogs
4 March 2026
Aneela Samrai
Solicitor
Blog Housing

The UN’s 2026 International Women’s Day Theme

This year, the United Nations’ theme for International Women’s Day 2026 is “Rights. Justice. Action. For ALL Women and Girls.” The theme calls for action to dismantle structural barriers to equal justice, including discriminatory laws, weak legal protections, harmful practices, and social norms that erode the rights of women and girls. It also advocates for inclusive and equitable legal systems.

At TV Edwards, we are committed to empowering women to assert and defend their rights. We believe that properly funded and accessible legal aid is essential to achieving this. In the Housing Team, we act for clients under legal aid funding to hold local authorities accountable by challenging:

  • Gatekeeping of homelessness assistance
  • Unlawful homelessness decisions
  • Offers of unsuitable temporary and permanent accommodation

The Gendered Impact of Homelessness

Through our work in the Housing Team, we observe the specific and often disproportionate effects of the UK’s ongoing housing crisis on women. Women’s experiences of street homelessness often differ from men’s, partly due to increased safety threats on the streets.

The Rough Sleeping Snapshot in England (Autumn 2025) reports that 15% of people sleeping rough on a single night were women. However, there is long-standing concern that official government statistics undercount women, as many take steps to stay out of sight to avoid harassment, exploitation, and violence, which makes them less likely to be recorded as rough sleepers. This under-representation is thought to affect service provision for women experiencing homelessness.

Legal Duties Regarding Temporary Accommodation

Where a local authority has reason to believe that a homeless applicant may be eligible for homeless assistance, homeless and in priority need, they are under a duty to provide emergency temporary accommodation. Where a local authority accepts that a homeless applicant is eligible, homeless, in priority need and not intentionally homeless and is therefore owed the main housing duty, they must secure that accommodation is made available to the applicant and their household until the main housing duty is discharged. Delays in final accommodation offers often result in applicants remaining in temporary accommodation for months or even years.

Women and Temporary Accommodation Statistics

Research by Shelter (December 2021) highlights the gendered impact of temporary accommodation:

  • Women make up 51% of adults in England but 60% of adults in temporary accommodation
  • Most women in temporary accommodation are mothers with dependent children
  • Lone mother families comprise one-third of all households in temporary accommodation meaning they are hugely over-represented
  • Households led by Black applicants are significantly overrepresented in temporary accommodation
  • Disabled parents, or parents of disabled children face disproportionate risks

Suitability of Temporary Accommodation

The law is clear that temporary accommodation must be suitable for a household’s specific needs. Suitability includes factors such as:

  • Space and arrangement
  • Location
  • Affordability
  • Overcrowding
  • Accessibility
  • Physical condition
  • Safety risks

The Homelessness Code of Guidance sets out a wide range of factors authorities must consider when assessing suitability.

In reality, temporary accommodation can be of a poor standard, can include shared facilities and can be far away from the relevant local authority’s own area. Temporary accommodation, by its very nature, creates instability. Homeless households can be left in temporary accommodation for years and be required to move out of the blue and multiple times. This instability is compounded by the fact that homeless households are often required to respond to offers of temporary accommodation on the very same day and move at extremely short notice, which can be very difficult in light of work and childcare commitments and school attendance. This can be profoundly destabilising and can exacerbate existing mental health conditions and trauma of those experiencing homelessness.

Difficulties in Challenging the Suitability of Temporary Accommodation

Persuading local authorities and courts that temporary accommodation is unsuitable can be difficult. The Courts are aware of the acute difficulties facing local authorities in providing good quality accommodation in their area and tend to allow quite wide discretion in placing households in different locations and accommodation types.

Homelessness law is complex and it can be confusing for homeless applicants to determine the correct route to challenge the suitability of their accommodation. Applicants will need to consider whether to pursue a challenge by statutory review, statutory appeal, or judicial review, and each option comes with its own strict timeframes, procedural requirements, and technical considerations. It can also be daunting to pursue a suitability challenge in circumstances where people experiencing homelessness may be exhausted, far from their vital support networks, struggling to cope with health conditions and past trauma, juggling caring responsibilities and trying to keep their children in school.

Furthermore, the evidential burden to persuade local authorities and the courts that temporary accommodation is unsuitable can be high and often requires compelling evidence from experts and professionals. Many homeless applicants struggle to obtain such evidence whilst battling with the everyday realities of homelessness and residing in unsuitable temporary accommodation.

Rights, Justice, and Access to Legal Support

Reflecting on the theme “Rights. Justice. Action. For ALL Women and Girls”, the right to suitable temporary accommodation, where the relevant criteria are met, does exists on paper. Legal mechanisms are in place to challenge unsuitability, as set out above.  

The consequences of unlawful decisions can be immediate and devastating with women and their families often left in unsuitable accommodation which has a detrimental impact on their health and welfare. The ability to assert and enforce rights often depends on access to timely and affordable legal advice and representation. With legal advice deserts growing across the country, many women are prevented from obtaining timely legal help to challenge the suitability of their temporary accommodation, even where the law provides a route for such challenges. Real access to justice for women in unsuitable temporary accommodation therefore requires action from the government to properly invest in housing legal aid. 

Systemic Solutions Beyond Legal Challenges

Furthermore, there must be action from Government to address the chronic shortage of genuinely affordable, secure housing. Without significant investment in social housing and effective measures to reduce reliance on poor-quality temporary accommodation, the system will remain stuck in crisis. Legal challenges can secure justice for individuals, but lasting change requires systemic solutions that prevent homelessness in the first place and reduce the need for families, that are disproportionately led by women, to live for months or years in, often unsuitable, temporary accommodation.

Conclusion

International Women’s Day is a reminder that equal rights must be resourced, defended, and enforced. The call for “Rights. Justice. Action. For ALL Women and Girls” must include the right to secure and suitable accommodation, along with the practical means to obtain it.

Disclaimer: The information on the TV Edwards website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication.

Related Services:
Housing Solicitors
Contact Us
020 3440 8000 enquiries@tvedwards.com Our Offices Contact Us