Aleena, Author at TV EDWARDS
TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

Dispute Resolution Explained: So Long, Contract and Thanks for All the Litigation.

Part 1 of Nathanael Young’s Dispute Resolution Monthly Series

Our Services Contact Us

I’d say 90% of the disputes I see start long before anyone calls it a dispute.

That’s probably the biggest lesson I’ve learned from doing dispute resolution work.

The problem usually doesn’t begin with the angry letter.

It doesn’t begin with the solicitor’s letter.

It doesn’t begin with the court proceedings.

It often begins months, sometimes years, earlier, when everyone was getting along perfectly well and nobody thought they needed legal advice.

And that’s where things get interesting.

Because when people are getting along, they tend to trust each other.

Which is lovely.

It’s also when they tend to make some remarkably expensive decisions.

Scenario 1: “It’s only a straightforward agreement.”

You sign an agreement.

You know the person’s name.

You’ve met them.

They seem genuine.

Everyone’s happy.

Except you’ve never checked who you’re actually contracting with.

No proper company details.

No company number.

No registered office.

No check as to whether the person signing actually has authority to bind the company.

Six months later, something goes wrong.

You instruct a solicitor.

The first question is:

“Who exactly is your contract with?”

Silence.

And suddenly something that looked like a straightforward commercial arrangement has become considerably less straightforward.

It’s amazing how much more interesting company details become when you’re trying to enforce an agreement against someone.

Scenario 2: “We signed it. I thought I had a copy.”

Another one I see far too often.

The parties sign an agreement.

Everyone shakes hands.

Keys are handed over.

Money changes hands.

The relationship starts.

And somewhere along the way, the final signed copy of the agreement disappears into the great administrative Bermuda Triangle.

Nobody has it.

One person has a draft.

The other has a slightly different version.

Someone remembers there was an appendix.

Nobody can find it.

And now everyone is trying to establish what they actually agreed to.

This becomes particularly painful when the agreement concerns property.

You hand over the keys to your property portfolio because you have an agreement with someone you trust.

Months later, the relationship breaks down. You want the properties back.

Then you discover that the document you thought governed the arrangement is either unsigned, incomplete, ambiguous or not quite the document you thought it was.

That’s not a good time to discover the importance of paperwork.

Scenario 3: “We’re going into business together.”

This one is probably my favourite. “I’m going into business with a friend.”

Fantastic.

“We trust each other.”

Even better.

“We don’t need a complicated agreement.” And there it is.

The sentence that may eventually become Exhibit A.

Because nobody goes into a partnership expecting it to fail.

But businesses change.

People change.

Money changes people.

Expectations change.

One partner thinks they’re putting in equal time.

The other thinks they’re putting in equal money.

One thinks profits are 50/50.

The other thinks their original investment entitles them to something different.

One wants to sell.

The other doesn’t.

And suddenly the two people who once finished each other’s sentences are communicating through solicitors.

The problem didn’t start when the relationship broke down.

It started when the relationship was good and nobody properly documented what would happen if it didn’t stay that way.

This is why I keep coming back to drafting.

People sometimes think legal drafting is about making documents longer.

It isn’t.

Good drafting is about making things clear.

  • Who are the parties?
  • What exactly are they agreeing to?
  • What does each person have to do?
  • When do they have to do it?
  • Who owns what?
  • What happens if someone doesn’t perform?
  • What happens if the relationship breaks down?
  • What happens if someone wants out?
  • What happens if circumstances change?

And, perhaps most importantly:

What happens when everyone stops getting along?

You don’t write a good agreement because you expect the relationship to fail.

You write it because you understand that circumstances can change.

The slightly uncomfortable truth.

A lot of people are willing to spend thousands of pounds fixing a legal problem they could have prevented for a fraction of the cost.

They’ll spend £50,000 litigating over an agreement they didn’t spend £2,000 properly negotiating.

They’ll spend months trying to recover control of an asset without having properly documented who had what rights in the first place.

They’ll enter a business relationship based on trust and then discover, several years later, that trust isn’t actually a substitute for an agreement.

And then someone says:

“But we all understood what we meant.”

Yes.

Until you didn’t.

That’s the thing about human beings.

We’re remarkably good at assuming that everyone else has the same understanding of a situation that we do.

Right up until the money is on the table.

And this is where dispute resolution really begins.

When people hear “dispute resolution”, they often picture courtrooms, barristers, cross examination and dramatic legal arguments.

The reality is much less glamorous.

Sometimes dispute resolution is looking at a contract before it is signed and saying:

“Hang on. Who exactly is this agreement with?”

Sometimes it’s saying:

“Don’t hand over the keys until we’ve sorted this out.”

Sometimes it’s:

“Before you go into business with your friend, let’s discuss what happens if you stop being friends.”

And sometimes it’s simply:

“Please get a signed copy and keep it somewhere safe.”

Not exactly Hollywood.

But considerably cheaper.

Why early advice matters.

This is why I believe dispute resolution solicitors should not only be called when the dispute has already exploded.

The most valuable advice can come before there is a dispute at all.

It can be about:

  • Checking the identity and status of the contracting parties.
  • Making sure the right people are signing.
  • Ensuring you receive and retain the final signed agreement.
  • Properly documenting property and commercial arrangements.
  • Advising on partnerships and shareholder relationships.
  • Identifying what happens if the relationship breaks down.
  • Spotting risks before money, assets or control are handed over.
  • Making sure the agreement reflects what the parties actually intend.

Because once the relationship has broken down, everyone suddenly becomes extremely interested in the wording.

Unfortunately, by then, it’s usually too late to improve the contract.

My first piece of dispute resolution advice.

If I could give just one piece of advice in this series, it would be this:

  • Get legal advice before making the big decision, not after.
  • Before you sign the agreement.
  • Before you hand over the keys.
  • Before you transfer the money.
  • Before you give someone control of an asset.
  • Before you enter that partnership.
  • Before you rely on a handshake and the words “we trust each other.”

You don’t need to wait until there is a dispute to speak to a dispute resolution solicitor.

In fact, the best time to get dispute resolution advice is when there isn’t a dispute.

Because by the time you’re sitting in a solicitor’s office saying “I wish I’d known this six months ago,” the advice is no longer preventative.

It’s remedial.

And remedial work is almost always significantly more expensive.

Think before the big decision. Get advice before the commitment.

That, in my view, is where good dispute resolution starts.

Part 1 of Nathanael Young’s 12 part Dispute Resolution Monthly Series.

Part 2: Can Your Claim Be Struck Out Before Trial?

Because sometimes the first time you discover there is a problem with your case is when the other side asks the court to get rid of it.

Disclaimer: The information on the TV Edwards website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication.

TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

Westminster Council Seeks to Curb Vertical Drinking in the West End

Westminster Council’s proposed measures to discourage “vertical drinking” have raised concerns about their potential impact on the industry.

Our Services Contact Us

Westminster Council is planning to implement a proposal in its draft Statement of Licensing Policy to discourage people from enjoying alcoholic drinks while standing up in bars and pubs – known as “vertical drinking,” in a bid to reduce excessive drinking and public nuisance. Concerns have been expressed regarding the impact of this recommendation on the social aspect of British pub culture and the late night economy in Soho which is a multi-billion-pound industry.

Westminster Council’s New Policy Proposals

Local authorities are required to prepare and publish a document called a Statement of Licensing Policy which outlines the local principles and framework they apply when making decisions on alcohol, entertainment, and late-night refreshment licenses. The policy must be updated every 5 years in accordance with section 5 of the Licensing Act 2003.

In June 2026, Westminster Council published draft proposals for its fresh Statement of Licensing Policy which is due to take effect in October 2026. In the draft proposals, the council stated that its aim was to “discourage excessive drunkenness and encourage the provision of more seating in premises that serve alcohol for people to sit and enjoy a drink and order food by table service in place of open bar space that caters for high volume vertical drinking.” The guidance suggests that applicants who are planning to open new bars or restaurants in Westminster and require licences should implement the restrictions by applying for “a predominantly seated operation with fixed seating,” alongside waiter service replacing vertical drinking and restrictions on customers consuming alcohol while standing. 

The council also operates a policy to refuse new licences for restaurants, pubs, bars, fast food or music venue licences in the Soho and West End areas, which are regarded as a cumulative impact zone due to the high density and volume of licensed venues. This results in an increased risk of crime and disorder and public nuisance. The new draft policy states, “The introduction of measures to reduce the extent of, or to remove opportunities for, vertical drinking could address the underlying reasons for the [cumulative impact] policy.”

Westminster Council has confirmed that the new policy proposals do not intend to ban drinking while standing up in pubs in Soho and instead intend to encourage venues to manage their customers to prevent overcrowding on pavements and excessive drinking. The leader of Westminster City Council has clarified that the proposals are about “public safety” and “There is no plan, and never has been, to ban drinking while standing up in a Westminster pub.”

Westminster has the UK’s largest concentration of licensed premises and the largest evening and nightlife economy, with about 500 pubs, bars and wine bars, and roughly 1,750 cafes and restaurants. Therefore, it contributes massively to the country’s nighttime economy and aids tourism and employment, with businesses of the area generating around £5 billion per year and employing around 8,000 people.

The Reaction to the Proposals

London’s Mayor, Sadiq Khan, opposes the proposals put forward by Westminster Council in its new policy, due to the negative impact they could have on the economy. The Mayor’s new strategic licensing regime, which came into force on 26 June 2026 through the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Act 2026, grants him powers to intervene in local alcohol, entertainment, and late-night refreshment licensing matters across the capital’s 32 boroughs. If Westminster’s new policy is approved, it would apply to Soho and the West End – two of the capital city’s largest nightlife hubs. However, the Mayor is using his new licensing powers for the first time to ask Westminster Council to rewrite the draft policy. The new London-wide strategic licensing framework allows him to create a city-wide policy via secondary legislation and affords him more authority on licensing decisions.

The Mayor is opposing “restrictive and anti-growth policies” in favour of protecting London’s vital nightlife and hospitality industries. A spokesperson for the Mayor’s office has stated, “At a time when nightlife and hospitality needs our support more than ever, policies like these would leave our venues facing extinction. And it would make our capital city less attractive for tourists.” The Mayor is also calling to get rid of the “core hours” policy to allow venues to stay open late into the night, stating policies that expect pubs, restaurants and nightclubs to close by 11:30pm on weekdays and midnight at weekends, are “overly onerous and archaic.”

Significantly, the Prime Minister’s office also opposes Westminster Council’s new policy proposals. A spokesperson for 10 Downing Street stated, “Busy pubs full of people talking to each other is not a public nuisance, it is British life and it is thousands of jobs” and “the Prime Minister encourages local leaders to work with the industry so that pubs can continue to thrive.” 

Additionally, the proposals have been criticised by the Soho Business Alliance, a non-profit organisation which represents business owners in Soho to protect the area’s economic diversity, heritage, and unique night-time culture. A spokesperson for the organisation has stated that the council is “trying to change the nature of Soho and it’s quite sad that they’ve gone to such lengths to sanitise the area.”

The chief executive of the Night Time Industries Association in London has also expressed concerns, stating, “Standing in pubs has always been part of Britain’s pub culture. It’s how people meet friends, watch live sport, wait to be served and enjoy the unique atmosphere that pubs have provided for generations.” They also stated, “Encouraging policies that favour more seating and reduced standing space risks changing the very character of these venues while reducing capacity, increasing operating costs and limiting flexibility for responsible businesses already under significant financial pressure.” Thus, being able to stand up while drinking in pubs is widely regarded as part of Britain’s pub culture and allows for socialising. There is clear concern about the impact of the proposals on businesses in the hospitality industry.

The Impact on the Pub Industry

The owner of a famous historic pub in Soho called The French House, has expressed that Westminster Council’s new policy proposals would lead to closures, redundancies, and loss of business. They are aware that their customers enjoy having a drink while standing up and being able to dance and move around when they go out.

The general manager of Bradley’s Spanish Bar, another pub in Soho, stated reducing “vertical drinking” would be the “nail in the coffin,” especially for independent pubs. He mentioned that his venue has limited seating and it would not be viable to operate the business with the restrictions imposed.

In recent years, a number of pubs have closed due to rising costs and taxes and shifting consumer habits. According to the British Beer and Pub Association (BBPA), 161 pubs closed in the first three months of 2026 across England, Scotland and Wales, equating to the loss of around 2,400 jobs. To put this into perspective, there were 44,650 pubs nationwide in the year 2025, compared with 60,800 in the year 2000. In addition to the impact on opportunities to socialise, there is also concern that the proposed policy restrictions could lead to additional business closures.

Although it is still possible to enjoy a seated drink with friends or loved ones, being able to stand up outside a pub offers a different experience and the chance to move around and speak freely with different people nearby.

City Hall, the official headquarters and office for the Mayor, has stated, “At a time when venues need our support more than ever, the rules on licensing are stacked against them. That’s why the new powers the Mayor is getting from government are so important, as they mean the Mayor will be able to call in licensing decisions and have a say in local policies to protect London’s vital nightlife and hospitality industries.”

How Our Licensing Solicitors Can Help

We provide comprehensive advice and representation on all aspects of licensing policies and licence applications:

We can help you by:

  • Reviewing and interpreting local authority licensing policies
  • Advising on how policies affect your application
  • Preparing compliant and strategically structured licence applications
  • Representing you in licensing hearings and negotiations
  • Justifying applications that deviate from licensing policies
  • Helping protect your licence from review or revocation

We act for a wide range of businesses, including restaurants, bars, pubs, nightclubs, event venues, and hospitality operators. Our solicitors routinely deal with applications for venues in cumulative impact zones, and we have experience with Westminster Council and other local authorities across London, making us equipped to advise any premises experiencing difficulties with a licensing authority.

We are specialists in negotiating with responsible authorities, residents’ associations and neighbouring properties to seek a compromise and ensure a suitable licence is obtained.

Why Choose TV Edwards?

  • Highly ranked in legal directories – Legal 500 and Chambers UK 
  • Immediate emergency support – Call us on 0203 440 8000
  • Specialist representation 
  • Hardworking problem-solvers – We fearlessly challenge evidence, protecting your interests
  • Honest and down-to-earth – We explain your options compassionately and in plain English
Related Services:
TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

Funding your divorce and financial settlement: What are your options?

Every client’s financial position is different, which means the most appropriate funding option will depend on your individual circumstances.

Our Services Contact Us

One of the first questions many people ask when considering divorce is: “How am I going to pay for legal advice?”.

Alongside concerns about your home, pensions, savings and financial security, the cost of legal representation can feel overwhelming.

The good news is that there are several funding options available. This article explores some of those options. You don’t necessarily need immediate access to cash to access expert legal advice, the right option will depend on your individual circumstances.

At TV Edwards we’ll discuss funding options with you at the outset so that you understand the likely costs involved and can make informed decisions from the beginning.

Commercial loans

Some clients choose to fund their legal fees through a commercial loan, such as a bank loan or credit facility. This can allow you to spread the cost of legal fees through affordable monthly repayments, helping you access legal advice without needing to pay the full cost upfront.

Litigation loans

Litigation loans are specifically designed to help people involved in legal proceedings who have wealth tied up in assets, but limited access to cash.

These specialist loans are typically repaid once your financial settlement has been concluded.

Before offering funding, lenders will usually assess:

  • the likely value of your financial settlement;
  • the strength of your case; and
  • whether repayment is likely following the conclusion of proceedings

 Interest is payable on these loans; independent financial advice should always be considered before committing to any loan.

Legal services payment orders (LSPO)

In some cases, the court can order one spouse to contribute towards the other spouse’s legal costs. A LSPO is generally considered a last resort where one party cannot reasonably fund their own representation.

When deciding whether to make an order, the court will consider factors including whether:

  • you are unable to reasonably fund your own litigation
  • you have been unable to obtain funding through a commercial or litigation loan; and
  • your spouse has the financial eligibility to contribute towards your legal costs.

These applications are not granted automatically, and each case will depend on its own circumstances.  

Which option is right for you?

Every client’s financial position is different, which means the most appropriate funding option will depend on your individual circumstances.

Concerns about legal costs should never prevent you from obtaining legal advice. Discussing funding options at the outset allows us to help you understand the likely costs involved, explore the options available, and find the most suitable approach for your situation.

TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

Recognition, Not Compensation: What the LGBT Financial Recognition Scheme Means for Affected Veterans

The LGBT Financial Recognition Scheme provides formal recognition to veterans affected by the ban on LGBT personnel

Our Services Contact Us

For many years, individuals serving in HM Armed Forces who identified as part of the LGBT community were dismissed, investigated, bullied, or subjected to significant mistreatment simply because of their sexual orientation or gender identity. There was no criminal wrongdoing, no issue with competence or performance, but rather a discriminatory policy that had devastating consequences for careers, livelihoods, and personal lives.

To acknowledge these historic injustices, the Government introduced the LGBT Financial Recognition Scheme. While the Scheme does not compensate veterans for their financial losses, it provides formal recognition of the harm caused and the Armed Forces’ regret for the treatment endured by those affected.

Recently, we were approached by a client seeking assistance with an application under the Scheme. Until then, we had not been aware of its existence. Learning about both the Scheme and the experiences our client had endured was deeply moving and highlighted just how important it is that veterans who may be eligible are made aware of the support available.

What is the LGBT Financial Recognition Scheme?

The Scheme is open to those who served in HM Armed Forces between 27 July 1967 and 11 January 2000 and who suffered as a result of the ban on LGBT personnel.

There are two payments available:

1.LGBT Dismissed or Discharged Payment

This payment is intended for veterans who were dismissed or administratively discharged, including officers who were instructed or pressured by their Service Board to resign or retire, solely because of their actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity.

Successful applicants receive a payment of £50,000.

2. LGBT Impact Payment

This payment recognises the wider impact experienced by LGBT personnel who were affected by the ban, even where they were not formally dismissed.

Payments are awarded across three levels:

  • Level 1: £1,000–£5,000
  • Level 2: £5,001–£10,000
  • Level 3: £10,001–£20,000

Applications for both payments are assessed together by an independent panel, separate from the Ministry of Defence.

Importantly, all payments are tax-free and do not affect means-tested benefits, ensuring veterans receive the full amount awarded.

Although there is no published timeframe for decisions, our client’s application was determined within six months.

It is important to remember that these payments are not compensation. Instead, they are intended to formally recognise the injustice suffered and acknowledge the Armed Forces’ regret for the treatment of LGBT personnel during this period.

Who Can Apply?

The Scheme is available to anyone who served in HM Armed Forces during the ban between 27 July 1967 and 11 January 2000 and experienced adverse treatment because of their sexual orientation or gender identity.

Eligible applicants may include:

  • Veterans who were formally dismissed or discharged.
  • Officers who were instructed, pressured, or required to resign or retire.
  • Individuals who experienced bullying, investigations, career stagnation, harassment, or other forms of discrimination, even if they remained in service.

One of the most common misconceptions is that only those who were dismissed can apply. This is not the case. Veterans who experienced other forms of discrimination may still qualify for an LGBT Impact Payment.

Applications can be submitted personally or by an authorised legal representative where a veteran lacks capacity or simply wishes to receive assistance.

How to Apply

Applications can be submitted in one of two ways:

  1. Through the LGBT Financial Recognition Scheme App.
  2. By completing a paper application form.

Applicants will first need to register or log in through the Defence Gateway to verify their service identity.

Supporting evidence may include:

  • Service records.
  • Discharge documentation.
  • Medical evidence.
  • A personal statement explaining the impact of the discrimination experienced.

A detailed list of supporting evidence is available within the Government guidance.

Where an applicant lacks capacity, an authorised representative, such as someone acting under a Power of Attorney or a legal adviser, can submit the application on their behalf. It should be noted, however, that legal costs are not covered by the Scheme.

The Government does not specify exact assessment times but confirms applicants will receive regular updates. Applications from terminally ill veterans are prioritised.

Where appropriate, decisions may be appealed in accordance with Part 5 of the Scheme Rules. Appeals must satisfy the Scheme’s criteria and should be supported by appropriate evidence.

Our Client’s Story

Our client contacted us in February 2025 after learning about the LGBT Financial Recognition Scheme.

He had joined the Army during the 1970s and was initially posted to Europe on a three-year engagement. He enjoyed military life and chose to extend his service for a further three years.

Following a transfer to another unit, however, his experience changed dramatically.He was openly told that colleagues were aware of his bisexuality and was subjected to bullying and less favourable treatment because of his sexuality.

During the 1980s, he attended a meeting with a senior officer where he confirmed that he had strong bisexual tendencies. Within a month, he was removed from his position and dismissed under the vague explanation that his “service was no longer required.”

After discovering the Financial Recognition Scheme, he approached us for assistance with his application. Within six months, he received the £50,000 LGBT Dismissed or Discharged Payment. While no payment can restore the career he lost or undo the treatment he experienced, receiving formal recognition represented an important moment of acknowledgement after many years. It validated his experience and demonstrated a willingness to recognise the injustice suffered by LGBT veterans.

Raising Awareness

Many veterans remain unaware that this Scheme exists.

If you, or someone you know, served in HM Armed Forces during the ban and experienced discrimination because of sexual orientation or gender identity, it may be worth exploring whether an application can be made.

The deadline for applications is 12 December 2026, and we encourage anyone who believes they may be eligible to apply as soon as possible.

Useful Links

How to Apply:

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/veterans-of-the-lgbt-ban-financial-recognition-scheme/lgbt-financial-recognition-scheme-guide-how-to-apply-for-a-financial-recognition-payment

Scheme Rules:

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69d4e507019a4faf2745b3b3/LGBT_Financial_Recognition_Scheme_Scheme_Rules_Version_6.pdf

Defence Gateway:

https://oauth2.defencegateway.mod.uk/lgbt

Recalling these experiences can be distressing. If you require emotional or practical support during or after your application, information about available support services can be found here:

https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/lgbt-veterans-support-and-next-steps

TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

How does the legal profession become neuroinclusive?

Changes are happening within the industry but, ultimately, legal professionals need training on neurodivergence to achieve a unified approach to cases

Our Services Contact Us
Alia Lewis
Partner - Head of Public Law Children

At least one in five people in society are neurodivergent. However, this statistic is based on diagnosed rates and is therefore likely a lot higher.

The term ‘neurodivergence’ encompasses conditions such as autism, ADHD, dyslexia, dyscalculia, dysgraphia and Tourette’s.

Despite the prevalence, society’s awareness and understanding of neurodivergence remains poor, which can have serious consequences when legal professionals fail to recognise and understand the presentation and needs of neurodivergent individuals.

My learning journey as mum to an autistic son with profound additional needs completely changed the way in which I work as a child protection lawyer and shone a light on how frequently neurodivergence is missed or misunderstood within family court proceedings.

The impact of this can be serious and includes:

  • Poor care planning and decision making;
  • Failure to make reasonable adjustments;
  • Trauma for families, affecting their ability to trust professionals;
  • Formation of unfair narratives and wrongful parental blame;
  • Children with complex profiles being placed in highly inappropriate foster placements where their needs are not fully understood or met; and
  • Infringements of article 6 and 8 rights, limiting opportunities for families to stay together

A simple example of how misunderstandings can arise is a scenario that occurs all too often in my family cases. I have lost count of the times that parents are characterised as argumentative, obstructive, aggressive, unable to take on board advice or consistently implement advice or criticised for ‘self-medicating’ with cannabis.

On the face of it, the parent lacks parenting skills and demonstrates behaviour that could be considered a risk to their child.

However, if that parent is neurodivergent, it might be that they process information differently. They may respond better to information being presented to them visually rather than orally, they may struggle with retaining information unless it is written down or recorded in some way so that it can be reviewed.

They may present with impulsive behaviour, but this could be a response to sensory stimuli or overwhelm. A parent who has ADHD may require medication. They may or may not be aware of their neurodivergence, they may use cannabis to help them cope.

Understanding the individual profile enables professionals to make reasonable adjustments both to the environment (such as in offices and court) and also to the way in which they work, that are conducive to an individual’s needs.

Feeling understood can help an individual to have the confidence to address maladaptive coping strategies. A picture begins to emerge from this example that, with the right understanding of human behaviour, a better outcome might be achieved.

I find that many of my neurodivergent clients present with ‘Systems Generated Trauma’ (SGT) which is the severe psychological distress and harm caused by the policies and practices of the public services that disabled children and their families are required to navigate.

This was highlighted by a major research study undertaken by Professor Luke Clements in 2025 for Cerebra, the charity for children with brain conditions and reinforced by other research studies.

So, how do we address these issues as legal professionals?

Before we touch upon the details of a case, it is imperative that we understand our client and how they function.

In my view, we do this by going back to basics and ensuring we understand human behaviour and what message that behaviour is communicating. Regardless of the area of law one practices in, our first job is to create rapport which ultimately helps to build trust within the working relationship.

I would argue the importance of building trust is heightened when we are supporting clients who have experienced SGT. Once we understand our client, we can then do our best to advocate for them.

Looking through a neurodivergent lens can completely change the landscape of a case, and therefore the outcome.

The first step is to achieve awareness across all areas of the legal profession. As they say, ‘you don’t know what you don’t know’ and I certainly didn’t understand how important it was to have an awareness of neurodivergence before I had my son.

Once professionals are aware, they can take steps to understand and once understanding is there, it provides a basis upon which lawyers can tailor their practice to meet the needs of their neurodivergent clients and ensure they are treated fairly within proceedings.

This is why we have developed our specialist neurodiversity aware family law team at TV Edwards, comprised of lawyers who are committed to providing tailored support to our neurodivergent clients with a trauma-informed approach.

Our understanding stems from additional training combined with personal and professional experience, with some of us having undertaken a Level 2 qualification in understanding autism.

What makes us unique is that we are taking a two-pronged approach to addressing the problems we’ve identified – the way in which we manage our cases and support our clients daily and also by working on crucial improvements within family justice, non-court dispute resolution and child protection when it comes to how we deal with cases that involve neurodivergent families.

With other lawyers I have co-founded a non-profit, cross firm working group called Family Law Advice for the Neurodivergent Community (FLANC), through which we are working to achieve:

  • Mandatory training on neurodivergence for all professionals working within family justice and child protection, which we are doing in collaboration with the Anna Freud Centre;
  • Best practice guidance; and
  • Various systemic changes, such as ‘all about me’ documents, to help understand a neurodivergent individual’s unique needs, communication styles and triggers; a neuroinclusive NCDR (non-court dispute resolution) toolkit to support neurodivergent clients in mediation, arbitration and negotiation; and a professionals meeting toolkit to help professionals plan productive, neuroinclusive multi-agency meetings.

In a groundbreaking move, the Family Justice Council also published excellent best practice guidance on neurodiversity for practitioners in January last year, which is the first of its kind and universally applicable to other areas of law.

So, changes are happening within the industry but, ultimately, legal professionals need training on neurodivergence to achieve a unified approach to cases and to achieve the best outcomes for the individuals we represent.

Through FLANC, our specialist team at TV Edwards are now working in earnest to achieve this for family justice professionals, and it is hoped this will be the catalyst to encourage similar training to emerge for other areas of our profession.

This article was first published in Legal Futures in July 2026.

Disclaimer: The information on the TV Edwards website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication.

TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

Child Maintenance for High-Net-Worth Individuals and Families: When CMS Is Not Enough

Our Services Contact Us

For most separated parents in England and Wales, child maintenance is calculated through the Child Maintenance Service (CMS). However, for high-net-worth individuals or parents with significant incomes, the CMS may not provide a fair reflection of a Child’s financial needs or the paying parent’s true ability to contribute.

The CMS limits and when you can apply to court

The CMS only assesses income up to a statutory maximum. While the CMS can calculate maintenance on income up to £156,000 per year subject to current regulations, many high earners have substantially greater income or wealth that falls outside the standard CMS calculation.

Where a parent’s earnings exceed that threshold, the receiving parent may be able to apply to the Family Court for additional financial provision, often referred to as a “top-up” order.  This can be in either ongoing matrimonial causes act matters on a divorce such as looking at school fees.  Alternatively regardless of marriage, a special application under Schedule 1 of the Children Act may be made for financial provision whether as a lump sum or a ‘top up’.

The court considers a range of factors, including the child’s reasonable needs, the lifestyle they enjoyed before separation, educational costs, extracurricular activities, housing needs and the financial resources of both parents. The aim is not to benefit the receiving parent but to ensure the child continues to enjoy an appropriate standard of living.

When income is more sophisticated than just a salary

High Net Worth cases can be particularly complex where income is derived from dividends, trusts, overseas assets, bonuses, or business interests. Full financial disclosure and expert legal advice are often essential to ensure that child maintenance arrangements are fair and reflect the family’s true financial circumstances.

Seeking early specialist advice from a family lawyer

If you believe the CMS assessment does not adequately meet your child’s needs, or you are facing a claim for additional maintenance, obtaining specialist family law advice at an early stage can help protect both your child’s interests and your financial position ensuring that arrangements are fair, proportionate and focused on what matters most: securing the best possible future for the child or children.

International Families

Many wealthy families have international connections with assets, businesses or residences in multiple jurisdictions.

Cross boarder issues can significantly affect child maintenance, particularly where a parent lives overseas or receives income from foreign sources. Questions of jurisdiction, enforcement and tax can all arise, making early specialist advice from a family lawyer really valuable. A family lawyer can help you identify the full range of options available to you.

How We Can Help

TV Edwards’ experienced family law solicitors advise on all aspects of child maintenance, including high-value cases that fall outside the standard Child Maintenance Service (CMS) calculation. Whether you are seeking a top-up order or responding to a claim, we provide clear, practical advice tailored to your circumstances.

To speak to one of our family law specialists, call 020 3440 8000, email family@tvedwards.com, or complete our online enquiry form.

TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

The Mayor of London’s Summer Streets Fund to Boost Al Fresco Dining

The Mayor of London’s £400,000 Summer Streets Fund is transforming 13 boroughs into vibrant outdoor destinations.

Our Services Contact Us

The Summer Streets Fund

The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, has re-launched the Summer Streets Fund this year to boost trade for the hospitality industry, promote employment and create vibrant spaces for dining, events and community cohesion across the capital. 

The announcement was made in the wake of the success of the first Summer Streets Fund in 2025, which was worth £300,000, and boosted al fresco dining in the London boroughs of Lambeth, Hackney, Waltham Forest and Westminster. Businesses in these areas reported an increase in footfall and revenue, as visitors and residents embraced the opportunity to attend more outdoor events.

This year, 13 London boroughs have received a combined grant of £400,000 to support al fresco dining, outdoor events, markets, cultural activities and extended trading hours throughout the summer and into autumn.  Revenue grants of £50,000 to £100,000 were made available for large scale al fresco projects, while “smaller” pocket al fresco schemes secured grants of £2,500 to £10,000, allowing local businesses to expand their outdoor spaces and welcome more customers.   

The Summer Streets initiative notably offered support to venues which hosted match screenings of the 2026 FIFA Men’s World Cup, enabling them to utilise funding to extend their operating hours and expand their capacity.   

Projects Supported by the Fund

• Large-Scale Projects: 4 projects in the boroughs of Barking & Dagenham, Brent, Greenwich, and Lambeth have received grants of up to £100,000 to transform local areas with outdoor dining, World Cup screenings, markets, and cultural activities.

• Pocket Schemes: 11 smaller projects in Brent, Camden, Ealing, Haringey, Hounslow, Islington, Lewisham, Newham, Sutton, and Waltham Forest have received up to £10,000 each.  These funds will deliver food and drink night markets, DJ sets, live music, and family-friendly community events. 

Additionally, the Mayor has introduced a “Weekend Hopper” travel initiative.  Passengers using London’s trams or buses on Saturdays or Sundays between 25 July and 31 August will pay a single fare for unlimited journeys across the capital on that day.

The Importance of the Summer Streets Fund

London’s hospitality sector has faced difficulties over recent years, due to post-pandemic recovery and the cost of living crisis, both of which have an effect on hospitality operators.  The Summer Streets Fund is a timely response to this pressure, allowing local authorities and businesses to extend trading hours and increase footfall to contribute to high street revival.

The fund also highlights the Mayor’s broader ambition to establish outdoor dining in London as a permanent feature of the city, rather than a seasonal novelty.  This intent is underscored by the Mayor’s decision to override local opposition to new licence applications in Soho, Westminster – one of London’s most prominent nightlife hubs. 

We recently published an article on this topic: ‘The Soho Society’s Decision to Challenge Licence Applications in Westminster’.

Three UK heatwaves so far this summer have further driven consumer demand for outdoor spaces, prompting London residents and visitors to seek relaxing outdoor environments to cool down.

A New Era for Licensing in London

The rollout of the Summer Streets Fund coincides with the launch of the Mayor’s new strategic licensing powers, which formally took effect on 29 June 2026.  This marks the first time the Mayor of London has held a direct, statutory role in the licensing process.

Under these new powers, the Mayor can:

  • Create a London-wide Strategic Licensing Policy;
  • Make formal representations on licensing decisions;
  • Act as a statutory consultee when individual boroughs revise their licensing policies; and
  • “Call-in” strategically significant licensing decisions. 

Through these powers, the Mayor aims to harmonise licensing practices across the capital, establishing a more cohesive system. Ultimately, the Summer Streets Fund serves as a practical tool to encourage local councils to champion and revitalise the capital’s bars, cafes, and broader nightlife economy.

How Our Licensing Solicitors Can Help

We provide comprehensive advice and representation on all aspects of licensing policies and licence applications:

We can help you by:

  • Reviewing and interpreting local authority licensing policies
  • Advising on how policies affect your application
  • Preparing compliant and strategically structured licence applications
  • Representing you in licensing hearings and negotiations
  • Justifying applications that deviate from licensing policies
  • Helping protect your licence from review or revocation

We act for a wide range of businesses, including restaurants, bars, pubs, nightclubs, event venues, and hospitality operators.  Our solicitors routinely deal with contested applications across London, and are specialists in negotiating with responsible authorities, residents’ associations and neighbouring properties to seek a compromise and ensure a suitably licence is obtained.

Why Choose TV Edwards?

  • Highly ranked in legal directories – Legal 500 and Chambers UK 
  • Immediate emergency support – Call us on 0203 440 8000
  • Specialist representation – Police station advisers, solicitors, and higher court advocates
  • Hardworking problem-solvers – We fearlessly challenge evidence, protecting your interests
  • Honest and down-to-earth – We explain your options compassionately and in plain English

Related Services:
TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

Understanding the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (TUPE)

An overview of TUPE obligations and the Labour government’s proposed reforms that could reshape employee transfer protections for employers.

Our Services Contact Us

An employer’s guide to TUPE and the potential future changes 

The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (commonly referred to as TUPE) are a critical set of laws in England & Wales that protect employees when a business, service, or part of a business is transferred from one employer to another. While the regulations are designed to safeguard employees, they also place significant obligations on the employers involved in the transfer process.

TUPE applies to situations where there is a transfer of an undertaking. This generally involves (but which shall not be limited to) the sale of a business, merger of a business and/or the outsourcing of services.

Current obligation under TUPE

For employers, TUPE creates several key obligations, including (but which shall not be limited to):

  1. Automatic Employee Transfer: Employees of the transferred business automatically become employees of the new employer on the same terms and conditions, including their length of service. The new employer must honour existing employment contracts and cannot impose changes unless there are valid economic, technical, or organisational reasons.
  1. Protection from Dismissal: Employees are protected from dismissal solely due to the transfer, unless the employer can show one of the aforementioned reasons for the dismissal. This makes it more difficult for employers to restructure or reduce staff following a transfer, particularly if the reason for doing so is linked to the transfer itself.
  1. Consultation and Information Requirements: Employers involved in a transfer are required to relevantly inform, and consult with, affected employees or their representatives (such as trade unions or employee representatives) before the transfer occurs. This consultation could include, for example, the reasons for the transfer, the impact on employees, and any measures the new employer intends to implement following the transfer.

Change on the horizon

The Labour government has recently launched a ‘call for evidence’, under its “Plan to Make Work Pay”, to obtain information for policy changes to TUPE, and to implement its plan to strengthen the TUPE regulations.

One of Labour’s future plans also includes removing the distinction between employees and workers, however this is still to be consulted on in full. One of the subsequent consequences of this could, therefore, be that all current workers would then fall within scope to transfer under TUPE. However, there are practical difficulties with this in that, for example, workers may not owe ongoing obligations to the employer and workers may not operate under its control, so it may be difficult for an employer to consult with a worker if they only work occasionally. 

Whether workers fall within the scope of TUPE has previously been an area of uncertainty, and the previous Conservative government proposed amending TUPE to clarify the position that workers were not protected, however the government changed before this could be implemented. Labour’s current position means that these changes seem very unlikely to happen now and, instead, Labour will need to address the difficulties of workers being caught within the scope of TUPE.

For employers, TUPE presents both challenges and opportunities. While the regulations are designed to protect employees, they also place significant responsibilities on employers. By understanding the key requirements and changes, employers can navigate TUPE transfers smoothly.

This article was first published in London Business Matters in July 2026.

Disclaimer: The information on the TV Edwards website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication.

TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

The 7 most common Divorce and Finance mistakes

This article explores some of the most common pitfalls and explains why obtaining expert legal advice early can make all the difference.

Our Services Contact Us

No one enters a marriage expecting it to end in divorce. If separation has become your reality, it’s normal to feel angry, upset, anxious or scared about your future, finances and family.

During such an emotional time, it’s easy to make decisions that feel right in the moment but could have lasting financial consequences.

Below are 7 of the most common mistakes I have seen people make when negotiating financial settlements during divorce.

  1. Moving out the family home – There can be pressure for one person to leave the family home, either to reduce conflict or for safety. Whilst this may be the right decision in some circumstances, moving out without first obtaining legal advice can have unintended consequences, for example making it more difficult to negotiate practical arrangements later. Before making any significant decision about your living arrangements, it’s important to understand how they may affect your financial position and future negotiations.  
  • Making financial decisions based on emotions – Separation often brings uncertainty and heightened emotions. Closing joint accounts, transferring savings, stopping mortgage payments, hiding assets and spending large amounts of money can complicate matters later and make it harder to reach a fair settlement. This behaviour can also be penalised and your spouse compensated for your actions.
  • Rushing to reach an agreement – Divorce is emotionally exhausting, so it’s natural to want it over as quickly as possible. However, agreeing to terms just to get it ‘finished’ before fully understanding your financial position can lead to regret in the future particularly if you have not secured a fair settlement. Taking a little more time at the outset will help secure a settlement that provides long term financial security for you and your family.
  • Overlooking Pensions – Pensions are often one of the most valuable assets within a marriage, yet they are frequently overlooked in financial negotiations. Unlike savings or property, pensions require careful valuation and should not simply be compared at face value to the family home.  In many situations specialist pension advice is needed to ensure they are divided fairly and appropriately.
  • Focusing on the small things – It’s easy to get caught up arguing over furniture, household items or possessions. Whilst these items may have emotional value it is very often not worth your time and energy, instead it is better to concentrate efforts on the bigger picture like where you will both live.  
  • Relying on advice from friends or social media or Chat GPT – Every family is different. What happened in someone else’s divorce may have very little relevance to your own no matter how similar their circumstances may sound. Chat GPT can be tempting to use for legal guidance but it is not a replacement for a legal professional.  It also carries the risk of putting your personal information on a platform you do not have control over.
  • Waiting too long to seek advice – One of the biggest mistakes people make is delaying legal advice because they hope matters will resolve themselves or because they are concerned about costs.

Early legal advice doesn’t mean increasing conflict, it means understanding your options before important decisions are made. It can often save time, reduce stress, and help avoid expensive mistakes later in the process.

If one person is reluctant for you both to obtain independent legal advice, this can sometimes be a red flag that should not be ignored.

Every divorce is different and there is no one size fits all solution. It is one of life’s most significant financial events. Taking time to understand your options, seek expert advice, and make informed decisions can help you avoid costly mistakes and give you greater confidence about the future.

How We Can Help

Navigating the financial aspects of divorce can feel overwhelming, but you do not have to face it alone. Our experienced family law team provides clear, practical advice tailored to your circumstances, helping you understand your options, protect your financial interests, and avoid costly mistakes.

Whether you are at the beginning of your separation or negotiating a financial settlement, we are here to support you every step of the way and help you achieve the best possible outcome for you and your family.

If you have any questions about financial settlements or would like to speak to one of our specialist family solicitors, please get in touch. Call 020 3440 8000 or email family@tvedwards.com.

Disclaimer: The information on the TV Edwards website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication.