Aleena, Author at TV EDWARDS
TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

The Renters’ Rights Act 2025: What Landlords Need to Know

This change is expected to provide greater security for tenants

Our Services Contact Us

The Renters’ Rights Act 2025 (“RRA 2025”) introduces significant reforms to the private rented sector in England. The aim is to improve security for tenants, raise housing standards and create a more transparent and accountable system for landlords.

This article provides an overview of the key changes and what they mean in practice.

Who Does the Act Apply To?

The RRA 2025 primarily affects the private rented sector in England. It applies to:

  • Private landlords;
  • Private registered providers of social housing;
  • Providers of supported accommodation;
  • Landlords offering temporary accommodation on behalf of local authorities.

Importantly, the RRA 2025 does not apply to local authority secure tenancies. While the legislation has limited impact in Wales, the main reforms are focused on England.

When Do the Changes Take Effect?

The reforms are being introduced in stages.

Some provisions came into force on 27 December 2025, however the most significant changes are expected from 1 May 2026. These include the end of “no fault” evictions, changes to tenancy structures and new tenant protections as explained within this article.

Further measures, such as a landlord ombudsman and a national landlord database are expected later in 2026, with additional reforms extending into 2027 and beyond.

The End of Fixed-Term Tenancies

One of the most fundamental changes is the abolition of fixed-term assured tenancies.

All new tenancies will become periodic (rolling) tenancies. This means:

  • Tenancies will continue indefinitely until ended by either the landlord or the tenant;
  • Rent periods must be monthly or for a period of less than 28 days; 
  • Fixed-term clauses will no longer have legal effect.

Existing tenancies will automatically convert to periodic tenancies once the relevant provisions come into force on 1st May 2026.

Abolition of “No Fault” Evictions

The RRA 2025 removes the provision which previously allowed landlords to use section 21 of the Housing Act 1988 to evict tenants without giving a reason.

Going forwards, landlords will only be able to recover possession by relying on specific legal grounds, serving a relevant and correctly drafted section 8 notice and obtaining a court order. Such grounds include matters such as rent arrears, anti-social behaviour or the landlord’s intention to sell or occupy the property.

This change is expected to provide greater security for tenants but it also means landlords must ensure they can evidence a valid reason when seeking possession.

Changes to Possession Grounds

Whilst “no fault” evictions are being abolished, the RRA 2025 expands and amends the existing grounds for possession.

Landlords will still be able to recover their property in defined circumstances but the process will be more structured. Courts will expect clear evidence and in many cases, possession will no longer be automatic.

There are also new safeguards. For example, landlords must generally comply with deposit protection rules and to register on a national database before the court will grant possession (although this latter protection is not expected to come into force until late 2026/early 2027).

Instructing a solicitor to advise on the new grounds for possession under the RRA 2025 is increasingly important for landlords because the legal landscape has shifted in a way that leaves far less room for error.

With the abolition of “no fault” evictions, landlords can no longer rely on a straightforward route to recover possession. Instead, every claim must now be based on a specific statutory ground and crucially, that ground must be properly evidenced and proven in court. This creates a more technical and in many cases, more demanding process.

A solicitor can help ensure that the correct ground is identified from the outset. Many of the revised and newly introduced grounds have detailed requirements, including notice periods, evidential thresholds and restrictions on when they can be used. Selecting the wrong ground or misunderstanding how it operates can lead to a claim being dismissed, cause delay, additional cost and potential loss of rental income.

New Rules on Rent Increases

The RRA 2025 introduces tighter controls on how and when rent can be increased.

Landlords will no longer be able to rely on rent review clauses in tenancy agreements. Instead, rent increases must follow a statutory process, typically requiring formal notice and giving tenants the opportunity to challenge increases through the First-Tier Tribunal.

In most cases, rent can only be increased once per year and arguably, tenants will have stronger rights to dispute excessive increases.

Ban on Rental Bidding

New rules introduced by the RRA 2025 will prohibit landlords from inviting or accepting offers above the advertised rent.

This is intended to create a fairer and more transparent market by preventing competitive bidding between prospective tenants.

We believe this will have particular effect on the residential rental market in London where demand is high and competition for well-presented properties is strong.

Landlords will therefore be well advised to carefully consider the rental market in the area their property is located before advertising the rental price of residential properties in the future.

Tenant Protection Against Discrimination

The RRA 2025 makes it unlawful for landlords to discriminate against prospective tenants because they:

  • Have children; or
  • Receive benefits.

Blanket bans such as “no DSS” or “no families” will no longer be permitted, except in limited circumstances where justification can be made, for example due to insurance requirements.

Tenants’ Right to Request a Pet

Tenants will have a new legal right to request permission to keep a pet. Such requests must be made in writing and contain a description of the pet.

Landlords must consider such requests and cannot unreasonably refuse them. Decisions must be made within a set timeframe and provided in writing.

This change reflects a shift towards greater flexibility in rental living, although landlords may still refuse where there is a valid reason.

What a ‘valid reason’ might be will likely depend heavily on the circumstances and we would suggest that landlords seek specialist legal advice on this point.

New Duties on Landlords, Stronger Enforcement and Penalties

The RRA 2025 introduces additional responsibilities for landlords, including a requirement to provide a written statement of key tenancy terms and information before the tenancy begins.

Failure to comply with these obligations can result in financial penalties. Local authorities will have strengthened enforcement powers, including the ability to investigate and issue fines.

Landlords who fail to comply with their obligations may face substantial financial penalties and in some cases, criminal liability. Rent repayment orders may also be made, requiring landlords to repay rent to tenants where certain offences have been committed.

In short, the strengthened enforcement regime means that compliance is no longer simply best practice, it is essential. Instructing a solicitor helps landlords navigate the new requirements with confidence, reduce risk and protect their position.

Introduction of a Landlord Ombudsman and Database

Further reforms include the creation of:

  • A national landlord redress scheme (often referred to as a Landlord Ombudsman);
  • A private rented sector database.

Landlords will be required to register and remain compliant. Failure to do so may result in penalties and could prevent landlords from regaining possession of their property.

It should be noted however, that these reforms are not expected to come into force until late 2026.

Improved Housing Standards

The legislation will extend key housing standards to the private rented sector, including:

  • The Decent Homes Standard;
  • “Awaab’s Law”, requiring landlords to investigate and resolve serious health hazards such as damp and mould within set timeframes.

These measures are designed to ensure safer and more habitable rental properties although these particular changes are not expected to be implemented until late 2026/early 2027.

What This Means in Practice

The RRA 2025 represents one of the most significant overhauls of the law governing the residential rental market in recent decades.

For tenants, it offers increased security, stronger protections and greater transparency.

For landlords, it introduces stricter compliance requirements and a more regulated environment.

It will therefore be important for landlords to understand their rights and obligations carefully as the reforms come into force.

How We Can Help

The changes introduced by the RRA 2025 are complex and will affect tenancy agreements, possession procedures and compliance requirements for landlords.

If you are a landlord and would like advice on how these reforms apply to your tenancies past, present or future, our specialist Dispute Resolution team can provide clear, practical advice to help landlords navigate these changes with confidence.

We assist with possession claims, including identifying the correct grounds, ensuring compliance with the new requirements and representing landlords where disputes arise. We also advise on regulatory obligations to minimise the risk of penalties, enforcement action and rent repayment orders, helping to protect your position.

Get in touch with our Dispute Resolution team on 0203 440 8000 or email adam.haffenden@tvedwards.com to discuss how we can support you.

Disclaimer: The information on the TV Edwards website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication.

TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

Running the Hackney Half Marathon for Samaritans: Why It Matters to Me as a Junior Solicitor

April is Stress Awareness Month and a reminder to prioritise mental wellbeing, especially in the legal profession.

Our Services Contact Us

In May 2026, I will be taking on the Hackney Half Marathon in support of Samaritans, a charity that provides vital emotional support to people experiencing distress or crisis. As a junior solicitor in civil litigation, this is a cause that resonates with me not only on a personal level but also in the context of my professional life.

I am an avid runner, having enjoyed the sport since an early age and hope to beat my current personal best of 1 hour 47 minutes on race day. Whilst the challenge itself is important to me, the motivation behind it is even more significant.

Mental Health in the Legal Profession

The legal profession is widely recognised as demanding and at times, emotionally challenging. Long hours, high expectations and the nature of the work can place considerable pressure on solicitors at all stages of their careers, particularly those who are newly qualified.

I feel that supporting Samaritans is one way of contributing to a broader conversation about mental health within the profession. Their work helps to ensure that anyone struggling has access to a listening ear, free from judgement. By raising funds and awareness, I hope to play a small part in reducing stigma and encouraging more open discussions about mental wellbeing among legal professionals.

Supporting Clients Beyond the Legal Issue

Working in civil litigation often involves engaging with individuals at difficult points in their lives. Whether the matter relates to personal disputes, housing issues or other sensitive circumstances, clients can be under significant emotional strain.

Samaritans provides a service that complements, in many ways, the support solicitors aim to offer their clients. While we advise on legal rights and remedies, organisations like Samaritans are there to support individuals emotionally through challenging times.

I believe that fundraising for this charity is therefore not only about giving back to the community but also about recognising the broader needs of those we work with.

Professional Responsibility and Giving Back

As solicitors, we are in a position of trust and responsibility. Supporting charitable causes is one way of demonstrating a commitment to the wider community and to issues that extend beyond our immediate work.

By fundraising for Samaritans, I hope to contribute to a cause that has a tangible and positive impact. It also reflects values that are central to the legal profession and my own personal morality; empathy, integrity and a commitment to supporting others.

A Personal Challenge with a Purpose

Training for a half marathon requires discipline, consistency and resilience which are qualities that are equally important in legal practice. Setting a goal to improve on my personal best adds an extra layer of motivation but the real focus is on raising funds and awareness for an important cause.

Fundraising has also been a rewarding experience in itself. It provides an opportunity to connect with colleagues, friends and clients and to be part of a collective effort to support a meaningful organisation, all things which are particularly important to me.

While writing this article and reflecting on how I maintain my mental health in such a demanding profession, I realised it would be a valuable opportunity to connect with my colleagues at TV Edwards. I was keen to learn how others look after their mental wellbeing and to gather any tips or suggestions they might be willing to share.

Many colleagues were generous in sharing what works for them and it was really reassuring and insightful to see the variety of ways people prioritise their mental health. Some of their suggestions included:

Wild water swimming! I love that no one can contact me for that hour and it really resets me on a Saturday morning for the weekend.

I am also a runner and find exercise is amazing for clearing my head and sorting out my stresses.”

“Feeling overwhelmed? Try this – pause and zoom out. Picture the Earth turning in the vast universe. Your problems are still real but also small in the grand scheme. Sometimes that shift in perspective is enough to help you take the next step and make a problem seem more manageable.”

“Swimming is wonderful for my mental health. No matter how stressed I am, I am always calmer after a swim. Outdoor swimming is even better.”

“Yoga and sound baths!”

Most lunchtimes whether I am working from home or at the office, I’ll go for a run. Partly a practical thing because it’s harder to find time in the evening around the kids, but it also breaks the day up and makes the afternoon much easier to tackle.”

“A hot chocolate in the sunshine!”

Thank you to those that shared their thoughts with me!

Why Samaritans?

Samaritans operates a 24/7 service for anyone who needs someone to talk to, offering confidential, non-judgemental support. At a time when conversations around mental health are increasingly important, their work remains as vital as ever.

In both our professional and personal lives, we will all encounter moments of difficulty. Knowing that there is somewhere to turn can make a significant difference. Supporting Samaritans helps to ensure that this service continues to be available to those who need it most.

If you would like to support my fundraising efforts or learn more about the work Samaritans do, please check out their website: https://www.samaritans.org/how-we-can-help/contact-samaritan/ and if you are able to, I invite you to make a donation however big or small using my fundraising link: https://www.justgiving.com/page/rosie-child-1?utm_source=EmailShare_SFMC&utm_medium=email_social&utm_campaign=LFCFRUK_Day7_1DonSelf

Thank you for supporting this amazing cause and me in my challenge!

Disclaimer: The information on the TV Edwards website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication.

TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

World Book Day 2026: Stories That Help Children Navigate Family Change

Reading together can provide comfort, structure, and a safe space for exploring feelings.

Our Services Contact Us

World Book Day is more than just dressing up as your favourite character — it’s a celebration of the power of stories. For children experiencing changes in their family, reading together can be a comforting and meaningful way to make sense of their world.

As family lawyers, we often guide parents through separation, divorce, or blended family arrangements. But beyond legal advice, one of the most powerful tools parents have is the simple act of reading with their children. Books can help children understand change, express emotions, and feel reassured that they are not alone.

Why Reading Together Matters

Reading is not just an enjoyable activity – it builds connection, promotes communication, and encourages understanding. For children who are neurodivergent, reading can be especially transformative. One of our lawyers, Partner and Head of Public Law Children Alia Lewis, shares her experience with her 11-year-old son who is autistic.

Orson didn’t begin to develop verbal communication until age six and reading together was initially challenging. Over time, rhyming stories by authors such as Julia Donaldson captured his attention, helping him anticipate words, participate in the story, and gradually develop reading skills. Today, he reads independently, and their shared reading moments continue to nurture connection, understanding, and curiosity.

This story highlights a universal truth: all children, regardless of how they communicate, absorb and understand far more than we often realise. Reading together is a small act that can provide comfort, structure, and a safe space for exploring feelings.

Books to Support Children Through Family Change

Children’s books that address changing family dynamics can be a wonderful conversation starter. Some age-appropriate recommendations include:

Under 7s

  • My Family’s Changing – Pat Thomas
  • Ms Cliff the Climber – Allan Ahlberg
  • Living with Mum and Living with Dad – Melanie Walsh

7 to 11s

  • One Mum Too Many – Anne Bryant
  • The Lottie Project – Jacqueline Wilson
  • I Cosmo – Carlie Sorosiak

11+

  • It’s Not the End of the World – Judy Blume
  • The Suitcase Kid – Jacqueline Wilson
  • Step by Wicked Step – Ann Fine

For children who enjoy rhymes and illustrations, stories such as Room on the Broom, Zog, A Squash and a Squeeze, The Gruffalo, Snail and the Whale, and Bear Shaped by Dawn Coulter-Cruttenden (about a young autistic boy coping with the loss of his teddy) are excellent choices.

Creating Comfort, Connection, and Conversation

World Book Day reminds us to pause, share a story, and connect. Reading together gives children a safe way to explore their emotions, while giving parents a tool to foster understanding, empathy, and joy. It’s a small ritual with a profound impact, especially during times of change.

Whether your child is neurodivergent or neurotypical, these shared moments can build reassurance, spark conversation, and create memories that last a lifetime.

How We Can Help

Family transitions can be challenging. Our specialists are here to provide guidance on child arrangements, relocation, divorce, or separation. Contact us at 020 3440 8000 or email family@tvedwards.com to speak to a family law professional who understands both the legal and emotional journey of family life.

Alia Lewis specialises in representing and protecting the rights of neurodivergent and vulnerable clients, bringing both professional expertise and a deep understanding of the unique challenges these families may face.

TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

International Women’s Day 2026 – “Rights. Justice. Action. For ALL Women and Girls”

Reflection on the impact of temporary homeless accommodation on women.

Our Services Contact Us

The UN’s 2026 International Women’s Day Theme

This year, the United Nations’ theme for International Women’s Day 2026 is “Rights. Justice. Action. For ALL Women and Girls.” The theme calls for action to dismantle structural barriers to equal justice, including discriminatory laws, weak legal protections, harmful practices, and social norms that erode the rights of women and girls. It also advocates for inclusive and equitable legal systems.

At TV Edwards, we are committed to empowering women to assert and defend their rights. We believe that properly funded and accessible legal aid is essential to achieving this. In the Housing Team, we act for clients under legal aid funding to hold local authorities accountable by challenging:

  • Gatekeeping of homelessness assistance
  • Unlawful homelessness decisions
  • Offers of unsuitable temporary and permanent accommodation

The Gendered Impact of Homelessness

Through our work in the Housing Team, we observe the specific and often disproportionate effects of the UK’s ongoing housing crisis on women. Women’s experiences of street homelessness often differ from men’s, partly due to increased safety threats on the streets.

The Rough Sleeping Snapshot in England (Autumn 2025) reports that 15% of people sleeping rough on a single night were women. However, there is long-standing concern that official government statistics undercount women, as many take steps to stay out of sight to avoid harassment, exploitation, and violence, which makes them less likely to be recorded as rough sleepers. This under-representation is thought to affect service provision for women experiencing homelessness.

Legal Duties Regarding Temporary Accommodation

Where a local authority has reason to believe that a homeless applicant may be eligible for homeless assistance, homeless and in priority need, they are under a duty to provide emergency temporary accommodation. Where a local authority accepts that a homeless applicant is eligible, homeless, in priority need and not intentionally homeless and is therefore owed the main housing duty, they must secure that accommodation is made available to the applicant and their household until the main housing duty is discharged. Delays in final accommodation offers often result in applicants remaining in temporary accommodation for months or even years.

Women and Temporary Accommodation Statistics

Research by Shelter (December 2021) highlights the gendered impact of temporary accommodation:

  • Women make up 51% of adults in England but 60% of adults in temporary accommodation
  • Most women in temporary accommodation are mothers with dependent children
  • Lone mother families comprise one-third of all households in temporary accommodation meaning they are hugely over-represented
  • Households led by Black applicants are significantly overrepresented in temporary accommodation
  • Disabled parents, or parents of disabled children face disproportionate risks

Suitability of Temporary Accommodation

The law is clear that temporary accommodation must be suitable for a household’s specific needs. Suitability includes factors such as:

  • Space and arrangement
  • Location
  • Affordability
  • Overcrowding
  • Accessibility
  • Physical condition
  • Safety risks

The Homelessness Code of Guidance sets out a wide range of factors authorities must consider when assessing suitability.

In reality, temporary accommodation can be of a poor standard, can include shared facilities and can be far away from the relevant local authority’s own area. Temporary accommodation, by its very nature, creates instability. Homeless households can be left in temporary accommodation for years and be required to move out of the blue and multiple times. This instability is compounded by the fact that homeless households are often required to respond to offers of temporary accommodation on the very same day and move at extremely short notice, which can be very difficult in light of work and childcare commitments and school attendance. This can be profoundly destabilising and can exacerbate existing mental health conditions and trauma of those experiencing homelessness.

Difficulties in Challenging the Suitability of Temporary Accommodation

Persuading local authorities and courts that temporary accommodation is unsuitable can be difficult. The Courts are aware of the acute difficulties facing local authorities in providing good quality accommodation in their area and tend to allow quite wide discretion in placing households in different locations and accommodation types.

Homelessness law is complex and it can be confusing for homeless applicants to determine the correct route to challenge the suitability of their accommodation. Applicants will need to consider whether to pursue a challenge by statutory review, statutory appeal, or judicial review, and each option comes with its own strict timeframes, procedural requirements, and technical considerations. It can also be daunting to pursue a suitability challenge in circumstances where people experiencing homelessness may be exhausted, far from their vital support networks, struggling to cope with health conditions and past trauma, juggling caring responsibilities and trying to keep their children in school.

Furthermore, the evidential burden to persuade local authorities and the courts that temporary accommodation is unsuitable can be high and often requires compelling evidence from experts and professionals. Many homeless applicants struggle to obtain such evidence whilst battling with the everyday realities of homelessness and residing in unsuitable temporary accommodation.

Rights, Justice, and Access to Legal Support

Reflecting on the theme “Rights. Justice. Action. For ALL Women and Girls”, the right to suitable temporary accommodation, where the relevant criteria are met, does exists on paper. Legal mechanisms are in place to challenge unsuitability, as set out above.  

The consequences of unlawful decisions can be immediate and devastating with women and their families often left in unsuitable accommodation which has a detrimental impact on their health and welfare. The ability to assert and enforce rights often depends on access to timely and affordable legal advice and representation. With legal advice deserts growing across the country, many women are prevented from obtaining timely legal help to challenge the suitability of their temporary accommodation, even where the law provides a route for such challenges. Real access to justice for women in unsuitable temporary accommodation therefore requires action from the government to properly invest in housing legal aid. 

Systemic Solutions Beyond Legal Challenges

Furthermore, there must be action from Government to address the chronic shortage of genuinely affordable, secure housing. Without significant investment in social housing and effective measures to reduce reliance on poor-quality temporary accommodation, the system will remain stuck in crisis. Legal challenges can secure justice for individuals, but lasting change requires systemic solutions that prevent homelessness in the first place and reduce the need for families, that are disproportionately led by women, to live for months or years in, often unsuitable, temporary accommodation.

Conclusion

International Women’s Day is a reminder that equal rights must be resourced, defended, and enforced. The call for “Rights. Justice. Action. For ALL Women and Girls” must include the right to secure and suitable accommodation, along with the practical means to obtain it.

Disclaimer: The information on the TV Edwards website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication.

Related Services:
TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

The Government’s Proposed Commonhold Reforms and Their Potential Impact on Businesses

These changes could significantly impact businesses across property development, management, and legal sectors, driving innovation and adaptation.

Our Services Contact Us

The Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 introduced commonhold as an alternative to leasehold property ownership in England and Wales. However, commonhold has not gained significant traction, largely due to its complexity and lack of support. The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 aims to overhaul property ownership laws, proposing reforms to make commonhold more accessible to developers and homeowners. These changes could significantly impact businesses across property development, management, and legal sectors, driving innovation and adaptation.

What is Commonhold?

Commonhold allows individual units within a building or development to be owned outright by the occupants, while shared areas (like hallways, gardens, and elevators) are collectively owned by all unit owners through a commonhold association. This differs from leasehold, where the land is owned by a separate freeholder, giving commonhold a more democratic structure. Despite its potential, commonhold has not been widely adopted due to its complexity and lack of understanding among developers and potential homeowners.

Benefits of Commonhold

Commonhold offers several advantages over leasehold:

  1. Long-Term Ownership: Unlike leaseholds, which lose value as the lease term decreases, commonhold provides permanent ownership of individual units;
  1. Improved Property Management: In leasehold properties, landlords and managing agents often oversee maintenance. Commonhold allows unit owners to manage their own affairs through the Commonhold Association, ensuring more accountability; and
  1. Standardised Documentation: Commonhold uses standardised agreements, reducing the inconsistencies often seen in individual lease agreements. This makes property management simpler and more transparent.

These benefits make commonhold an attractive alternative, addressing issues like depreciation of leasehold values, inconsistent management, and complex lease terms.

Limitations of Commonhold

While commonhold offers many benefits, there are some limitations:

  1. Collective Decision-Making: Like share-of-freehold arrangements, commonhold requires all owners to make decisions collectively. This can lead to disagreements over property management, especially when owners have differing priorities;
  1. Lack of Statutory Protections: Unlike leaseholders, commonhold owners do not have legal protections to challenge the reasonableness of service charges, leaving them vulnerable to unfair charges; and
  1. Restrictions on Leasing: Commonhold also limits the ability to lease units for more than seven years, which could deter investors or owners who want long-term rental income.

Impact on Businesses

The proposed reforms could significantly affect businesses in several areas:

  1. Property Development: Many developers currently focus on leasehold properties, where they retain control over the land and collect ground rents. With commonhold, developers may lose these revenue streams. However, commonhold could offer a more transparent and secure ownership model, which may appeal to buyers.
  1. Mortgage Lending: Lenders may be concerned about the absence of forfeiture as a method of debt recovery in commonhold (as this allows landlords to regain control of a property if the tenant defaults on rent). Without this option, lenders may face challenges recovering debts if owners default, raising concerns about the financial stability of commonhold.
  1. Property Management: Businesses in property management will need to adjust to the collective ownership model of commonhold. Instead of relying on a single landlord or agent, management responsibilities are shared among owners. This could create opportunities for property management companies to offer services tailored to the unique needs of commonhold communities.
  1. Impact on the Housing Market: If commonhold becomes more widely adopted, buyers may increasingly prefer properties with clear, long-term ownership structures that do not involve ground rent payments or the risks of leasehold enfranchisement. This could lead to changes in property pricing, demand, and investment strategies.

Conclusion

The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 represents a significant shift in property ownership law. While the transition to commonhold may present challenges, it offers businesses the chance to innovate and adapt in a market that values transparency and long-term security, and businesses in the property sector must embrace these changes to stay competitive and meet evolving consumer demands.

This article was first published in London Business Matters in March 2026.

Disclaimer: The information on the TV Edwards website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication.

TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

Navigating the SQE2: a first-hand introduction

A guide for aspiring solicitors who have questions about the SQE2.

Our Services Contact Us

The below is intended as a brief introductory guide for aspiring solicitors who are exploring the SQE route to qualification as a solicitor. I have previously written about the first part of the SQE exam – the SQE1 – in an earlier TV Edwards blog.

What follows is drawn from my own experiences of the SQE2 assessment, which I passed last year at the first attempt during my training contract at TV Edwards.

SQE2: the basics

Whereas the SQE1 tests a candidate’s “functioning legal knowledge” through a gruelling ten-hour multiple-choice exam, SQE2 tests knowledge of the law and various legal skills mapped against the SRA’s Statement of Solicitor Competence.

The SQE2 consists of 16 exam ‘stations’ spread across five days. Each station tests different legal skills. Two of the assessment days entail role-playing oral assessments, the other three days are writing-only.

The stations include:

  • Oral advocacy
  • Client interviewing and preparation of an attendance note
  • Written case analysis
  • Legal research
  • Legal writing and drafting

The areas of law assessed in SQE2 are broadly the same as SQE1:

  • Criminal law and litigation
  • Dispute resolution (contract and tort)
  • Land law and property practice
  • Equity and trusts
  • Wills and probate
  • Business law

As with SQE1, issues relating to professionalism and ethics are tested pervasively throughout SQE2.

Dates of the assessments are listed here.

At the time of writing, the cost to sit SQE2 is £2,974.

Most people will need to pass SQE1 before they can sit SQE2. However, if you have already passed the LPC (or meet other transitional requirements), you might be able to use qualifying work experience plus the SQE2 to replace the need for a training contract (see this page for more information about this process).

How is SQE2 marked

The SQE2’s Marking and Standard Setting Policy is complicated, but in the simplest terms, the assessor will score candidates between 0 and 5 for various skills and their correct and thorough application of the law. In contrast to the objective nature of the SQE1’s marking, SQE2 is graded via the subjective professional judgement of the assessor. There are limited grounds to appeal one’s marks.

On results day, candidates will be provided with a full breakdown of their marks across each of the sixteen stations, and results will be broken down into charts that look like this:

The full list of skills criteria relating to each station can be found here. Examples of skills that candidates will be assessed against include:

  • Listening to the client and using questioning effectively to enable the client to tell the solicitor what is important to them
  • Providing client-focused advice (i.e advice which demonstrates an understanding of the problem from the client’s point of view and what the client wants to achieve, not just from a legal perspective)
  • Using appropriate language and behaviour
  • Presenting a persuasive argument
  • Identifying and use relevant sources and information
  • Structuring the document appropriately and logically

It is possible to score marks for skills whilst not applying the law correctly, and likewise, it’s theoretically possible to score marks for one’s correct application of the law whilst not doing well on skills.  This might provide some comfort to candidates as it means that drawing a blank on the law may not be fatal, but it is naturally more difficult to gain skills marks without having some confidence in the underlying law.

Preparing for SQE2

If you are currently working in a legal role then you’re most likely already developing some of the skills required to pass SQE2. However, in my view it is essential to enrol onto a course with proper training materials and good mock exams in order to pass SQE2.

As with SQE1, preparing for SQE2 will require time, consistency, and dedication. Juggling SQE2 preparation with a full-time job and any other responsibilities will be a challenge for most people.

I sat SQE2 nearly three years after SQE1. This meant a lot of my initial focus for SQE2 was re-learning and memorising the vast curriculum of ‘black letter law’ that was tested in SQE1. I know some candidates sit SQE2 very soon after passing SQE1, and in hindsight this approach has clear advantages, as the underlying law should be ‘fresher’ meaning efforts can focus on honing skills and learning the format of the stations.

A lot has been made of the difficulty and low pass-rate of SQE1, but the SQE2 is also a very tough exam. The SQE2’s pass rate is significantly higher than SQE1 (which, again, should provide some comfort) but SQE2 is still a demanding test of memory and skills under intense time pressure, and it requires significant preparation.

SQE2 is a completely closed-book exam, meaning (unlike solicitors!) you will have to advise your client without being able to check the law. In SQE1, you pick the correct answer from a list, while in SQE2, the right answer is not placed in front of you. I may be in the minority, but I personally found SQE2 to be more challenging than SQE1.

Tips for success

  1. Leverage social networks to learn from other peoples’ experiences. While social media posts about the SQE often relate to the stress and anxiety of the experience, there is also a lot of useful insight out there. If you can block out the negativity, I found reddit to be a great source of SQE information.
  2. Be familiar with the skills being assessed and the marking criteria of each station. The SQE2 marking system can seem labyrinthian, but if you understand what the assessor is grading you on, you can focus your efforts in the right places.
  3. Start preparation early. Create a study plan and stick to it. Don’t expect to have much of a social life until it’s over – celebrate afterwards!
  4. Mocks, mocks, mocks. As with SQE1, it’s crucial to know what to expect on the day, and to be comfortable with the format and layout of the different stations.
  5. Be confident, not complacent. If you’re sitting SQE2, you’ve most likely got through SQE1, and statistically, that’s the hardest part. But don’t rest on your laurels, because SQE2 represents a different type of challenge.

Passing SQE2 and qualification

After confirmation of passing SQE2, and registering two years’ qualifying work experience, all that typically remains before being admitted to the roll of solicitors is to pass the SRA’s character and suitability requirements.

I was able to complete this process within days of receiving my results, and before I knew it I was starting my new role in TV Edwards’ fantastic social welfare team as a qualified solicitor.

Disclaimer: The information on the TV Edwards website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication.

TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

The Doomsday Clock and What Divorce in England Can Teach Us About Risk, Power and Redistribution

As the Doomsday Clock warns of global risk, divorce law in England exposes how quickly power, assets and certainty can shift when a marriage breaks down.

Our Services Contact Us

When the Doomsday Clock moves closer to midnight, as it just has, it is intended as a warning — not of inevitability, but of risk. Designed by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, the clock symbolises how near humanity is to self-inflicted catastrophe. Each movement reflects growing instability: geopolitical conflict, economic fragility, climate pressure, and the erosion of trust in institutions.

In many ways, the same dynamics are increasingly visible much closer to home — in the breakdown of marriages in England and Wales.

Divorce, like global crisis, rarely arrives suddenly. It is usually preceded by warning signs: imbalance of power, financial opacity, misplaced assumptions about security, and a belief that “what’s mine will always remain mine.” When a relationship reaches its own version of midnight, many are shocked by how exposed they truly are.

One of the least understood aspects of divorce in England is the breadth of the court’s powers under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. Unlike some jurisdictions where property rights are rigid or formulaic, English family law is deliberately flexible — and, to some, alarmingly interventionist.

The Act allows the court to divest individuals of property and assets, regardless of legal ownership. Assets held in one spouse’s sole name — including businesses, investments, pensions and inherited property — can be transferred, sold, or redistributed entirely. Legal title, in itself, offers no absolute protection.

To the financially stronger spouse, this can feel like a form of economic disarmament. Years of accumulation, planning and ownership can be reshaped by judicial discretion. Much like nations that assume their dominance guarantees safety, individuals often underestimate how quickly circumstances — and power — can shift.

Yet this is only half the story.

The same legal framework that removes assets from one party is also designed to protect and support the financially weaker spouse. The Matrimonial Causes Act is rooted in fairness, not punishment. Its central objective is to ensure that divorce does not result in one party maintaining security while the other faces hardship, particularly where sacrifices were made during the marriage.

For many spouses — often those who stepped back from careers to raise children or support a partner’s ambitions — the court’s redistributive powers are not a threat but a lifeline. Without them, financial inequality created during marriage would simply be entrenched after it ends.

In this sense, the law acts less like a weapon and more like a stabilising mechanism. Redistribution is not about levelling outcomes perfectly, but about recognising contribution in its broadest sense — financial, domestic, emotional and relational.

The movement of the Doomsday Clock reminds us that systems fail when imbalance goes unchecked. Divorce law in England reflects an attempt — imperfect, human and discretionary — to prevent precisely that. It acknowledges that unchecked financial power within a marriage can lead to injustice once the relationship collapses.

For individuals, the lesson is not fear, but awareness.

Marriage is not merely a romantic union; it is a profound legal and economic partnership. Understanding the reach of the Matrimonial Causes Act is not pessimism — it is preparedness. Just as global leaders ignore warning signals at their peril, individuals who fail to understand the financial consequences of divorce risk being caught unprepared when their own clock strikes midnight.

For that reason, increasing attention is being given to pre-nuptial and post-nuptial agreements. While not automatically binding in England and Wales, they are now afforded significant weight by the courts when properly prepared, freely entered into, and supported by full financial disclosure. In many respects, they operate as a form of insurance — not against the failure of a marriage, but against uncertainty if it does fail.

Such agreements allow couples to define, in advance, how individual or inherited wealth should be treated, while still preserving fairness. They encourage transparency, early conversation and realism — qualities that can strengthen relationships rather than undermine them.

Embarking on marriage with eyes open to its legal consequences is not unromantic. It is responsible. Just as the movement of the Doomsday Clock invites sober reflection rather than panic, so too should the law governing divorce prompt thoughtful preparation rather than denial.

Because lasting stability — whether personal or global — is built not on optimism alone, but on understanding the risks before midnight ever comes.

TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

County Court Claims – The Procedure

Legal representation can help to alleviate the often inevitable emotional strain and distress that come with legal disputes.

Our Services Contact Us

Introduction

County Court proceedings can often feel daunting for individuals and businesses alike, particularly for those unfamiliar with the civil litigation process. From pre-action requirements to strict procedural rules and case management deadlines, there are many stages at which mistakes can be costly. Understanding how a claim progresses through the County Court, the different tracks it may be allocated to, and what is expected of the parties involved is therefore essential. This blog provides an overview of the key stages of a County Court claim in England and Wales and highlights the importance of obtaining appropriate legal advice throughout the process.

Pre-Issue Steps

Before making the decision to pursue a claim through county court proceedings, the claimant ought to have taken all reasonable steps to resolve the dispute with the defendant as well as having served an appropriate letter before action in accordance with any relevant Pre-Action Protocol.

Both potential claimants and defendants alike will want to carefully consider the benefit of instructing a solicitor at this pre-action stage to obtain vital advice on their legal position and the likely prospects of success of their potential claim or defence, as well as valuable representation in the preparation of a suitable letter before action and in the potential pre-action negotiations.

Legal representation at this early stage can ensure that the parties are well informed from the outset which can allow them to make decisions on appropriate settlement options thus negating the need for court proceedings at all.

Filing and Issuing the Claim with the County Court

Unfortunately, sometimes litigation cannot be avoided and the claimant may proceed to file their claim with the county court.

In certain circumstances and if the claim is for money only, the claimant may decide to issue the claim using the Money Claim Online service. In most other cases, the claimant will file their claim at the county court local to the parties.

Once received by the court, the claim will be ‘issued’ by the court and the Defendant will usually have 14 days from this date to file and serve their defence.

If the defendant has not already instructed a solicitor, they may consider doing so at that stage so that they may be guided through the process of preparing a robust defence (if they intend to defend the claim) and/or obtaining more time to respond to the claim.

The Four ‘Tracks’

If the defendant does file a defence, the court will then provisionally allocate the claim to the most appropriate ‘track’.

There are four civil court tracks in England and Wales; the Small Claims Track, Fast Track, Intermediate Track and Multi-Track.

Which track the claim will be allocated to is determined by the claim value and complexity and how the claim will then proceed through the court will depend on the track it is allocated to.

  • Small Claims Track: For lower-value, less complex disputes, generally up to £10,000 (excluding personal injury/housing), with limited cost recovery for the successful party.
  • Fast Track: For claims between £10,000 – £25,000 (excluding complex cases), features fixed recoverable costs schemes and stricter case management.
  • Intermediate Track: For less complex claims from £25,000 – £100,000, also with fixed recoverable costs scheme and more involved case management procedures.
  • Multi-Track: For very complex cases or claims over £25,000 (or £100,000 for some cases), allowing flexible case management and detailed costs assessment.

Case Management

There are different procedural rules which govern the case management of claims on the different tracks and so the steps which must be taken by the parties before a trial can take place will vary depending on the type of claim in question.

For example, in the Small Claims Track, the parties will likely be required to deliver copies of all documents on which they intend to rely to both the other parties and the court by a date set by the court in the proceedings. The parties are also likely to be required to partake in a mandatory mediation through the Small Claims Mediation Service.

The procedural case management steps in Fast Track, Intermediate Track and Multi-Track claims will often be much more involved and time consuming. In claims allocated to such tracks, the parties can expect to be required to carry out some or all of the following procedural steps before their claim reaches trial;

  • Completion of directions questionnaires to assist the court in making appropriate case management decisions;
  • Preparation of costs budgets (although this depends on the track the claim is allocated to);
  • Attendance at a directions hearing or costs and case management conference;
  • Disclosure of documents relevant to the claim by both parties;
  • Exchange of written witness evidence (usually in the form of a witness statement);
  • Instruction of an appropriate expert witness and the exchange of an associated evidence;
  • Attendance at a pre-trial review hearing;
  • Preparation of trial bundles often to include all papers relevant to the claim organised as directed by the court or Civil Procedure Rules.

The above is by no means an exhaustive nor definite list and the case management/procedural steps the parties are directed to complete, will be case dependent. However, in each case the parties will be required to complete the relevant procedural steps by deadlines set by the court and a failure to meet these deadlines can be catastrophic to a party’s case.

Whilst it is therefore useful for parties to litigation to have an understanding of generally what to expect from county court proceedings, claimants and defendants alike will likely find it particularly beneficial to engage a solicitor specialising in dispute resolution and civil litigation to represent and guide them through the proceedings and to hopefully, a successful resolution.

The Benefits of Legal Representation in a County Court Claim

Legal representation can help to alleviate the often inevitable emotional strain and distress that come with legal disputes and particularly court proceedings. There is no doubt that county court proceedings and particularly those allocated to the Fast Track, Intermediate Track and Multi-Track, are time consuming, stress-inducing and complex.

However, solicitors specialising in dispute resolution and civil litigation and trained and practiced in court procedure and case management. The practice of all solicitors is also underpinned by the 7 SRA Principles which (amongst other things) require solicitors to act in a way that upholds the constitutional principle of the rule of law, and the proper administration of justice and act in the best interest of each client.

In instructing a suitably qualified and experienced solicitor to represent them in a dispute, parties can therefore feel supported and well advised throughout the county court process in accordance with their solicitor’s duty to the court and to their client.

How we can Help

Our experienced Dispute Resolution team can provide strategic advice, manage risk and ensure that your interests are protected to produce a more favourable outcome.

Contact us for a free, no obligation initial discussion on 020 3440 8000 or email adam.haffenden@tvedwards.com

Disclaimer: The information on the TV Edwards website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication.

TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

Reflections of a Divorce Lawyer

As we move into 2026, our priority is to help clients navigate change with clarity, confidence and compassion, whatever the future holds.

Our Services Contact Us

As 2025 draws to a close, it is a good moment to reflect on how family law has continued to evolve and what we, as practitioners and clients alike, can expect as we move into 2026. At TV Edwards, our family law team has seen first-hand how social change, economic pressure and legal reform continue to shape the way families navigate separation and plan for the future.

One of the most significant shifts of recent years – no-fault divorce – is now firmly embedded in practice. By the end of 2025, the emotional temperature of many divorce proceedings has noticeably reduced. Removing the need to apportion blame has helped couples focus earlier on practical solutions: arrangements for children, financial settlements and future planning. While divorce is never easy, the process is generally more constructive, and this has supported the wider move towards non-court dispute resolution, including mediation and collaborative law.

Alongside this, the financial landscape has had a real impact on family law. Ongoing cost-of-living pressures have meant that careful, realistic financial planning is more important than ever. We are seeing greater scrutiny of budgets, housing needs and pension provision, particularly where parties are separating later in life. There is also increased awareness of the long-term consequences of financial settlements, with clients keen to achieve outcomes that are resilient in uncertain economic times.

Cohabitation remains one of the most pressing and misunderstood areas of family law. Despite repeated public debate and long-standing calls for reform, there is still no comprehensive legal framework governing the rights of unmarried couples when they separate. The “common law marriage” myth continues to catch people out. As a result, cohabitation agreements have become increasingly mainstream in 2025. More couples are recognising that putting clear arrangements in place at the outset – or when circumstances change, such as buying a property or having children – can prevent costly and painful disputes later on. We expect this trend to accelerate in 2026, particularly if legislative reform remains slow.

Another notable development is the growing emphasis on early legal advice and preventative planning. Pre-nuptial and post-nuptial agreements are now widely accepted as sensible tools rather than pessimistic gestures, especially where there are family businesses, inherited wealth or international connections. Courts continue to give significant weight to well-drafted nuptial agreements, provided they are fair and entered into with proper advice.

Looking ahead to 2026, we anticipate further refinement rather than radical overhaul. The courts are likely to continue encouraging out-of-court resolution, and technology will play an increasing role in how cases are managed. At the same time, societal changes – including how families are formed and how parents share care – will keep family law firmly in the spotlight.

At TV Edwards, our focus remains on combining technical expertise with a practical, human approach. As we move into 2026, our priority is to help clients navigate change with clarity, confidence and compassion, whatever the future holds, please contact one of our family law specialists by calling 020 3440 8000 or email family@tvedwards.com.

Disclaimer: The information on the TV Edwards website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication.