nesar, Author at TV EDWARDS - Page 23 of 30
TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

Case of P-S (Children) [2018] EWCA Civ 1407

Our Services Contact Us

Successful appeal of final care orders made instead of SGOs. Considering SGOs being made before a trial placement, status of extra judicial guidance and the role of Special Guardians in the court process.  

The Court of Appeal has handed down a significant decision regarding the making of final care orders instead of special guardianship orders, and the status of non-statutory guidance and when it should be followed.

Our Hannah Perry acted for the children, through their Guardian Jeff Boyd in the case at the first instance and on instructions of the children’s guardian successfully appealed the decision of HHJ Tolson QC to make final care orders.

The leading judgment was given by Sir Ernest Ryder. He allowed the appeal and was clear that the judge at first instance was influenced by informal guidance given by a High Court judge in his role as a leadership judge.  The Court of Appeal make it clear that such guidance is not the same as authoritative guidance or a practice direction for the reasons set out in the judgment.

The judgment reiterates that the 26 week time limit for care proceedings may be extended if the court considers that the extension is necessary to enable the court to resolve the proceedings justly; and  the President of the Family Division, Sir James Munby P refers to previous judgments which have confirmed that the timetable should be extended when there is good reason to do so. As the President says: ‘In relation to SGOs, as elsewhere, justice must never be sacrificed upon the altar of speed’.

Both Sir Ernest Ryder and Sir James Munby P were clear that there needs to be authoritative guidance about the making of special guardianship orders, and they invite the multi-disciplinary Family Justice Council to provide this guidance. 

Due to the significance of the issues the Association of Lawyers for Children, “the ALC”, intervened in the appeal.

The Judgment can be found here: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2018/1407.html

Related Services:
TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

‘I want to see my grandchildren’: Do grandparents have legal rights?

Our Services Contact Us

Grandparents play an  important role in children’s lives and research has shown that they have a positive impact, particularly on adolescents and when families are going through difficult times.

A rising number of grandparents are going to court to spend time  with their grandchildren. Statistics show that almost 2000 applications for child arrangements orders were made by grandparents in 2016.

The issue received press attention last month when it was debated in parliament, with MPs sharing experiences of their constituents. The last review of the law around grandparents seeing their grandchildren was the Family Justice Review in 2011. It seems that this will now be reconsidered along with other family law reforms. A Ministry of Justice spokesperson is quoted as saying “We will consider any proposals for helping children maintain involvement with grandparents, together with other potential reforms to the family justice system, which are currently being looked at.”

At TV Edwards, we are frequently contacted by grandparents who are seeking to have contact with their grandchildren. Although there is a presumption that involvement of a parent in the life of the child will further the child’s welfare (unless there are reasons to the contrary), that is not the case for other members of the family, such as grandparents. Family courts do, however, recognise the invaluable roles that grandparents have to play in their grandchildren’s lives.

Often, child arrangements can be negotiated through a family solicitor without the need to attend court. Mediation can also assist in resolving disputes without the need to go to court. However, if the relationship between the parents and grandparents has broken down significantly, there may need to be an application to the court for a child arrangements order, for the grandparents to be able to spend time with their grandchildren.

Can I make an application to the court?

Grandparents are not automatically entitled to apply for a child arrangements order, and they must obtain the permission of the court.

When deciding whether the grandparents should be given permission, the court will have particular regard to:

  1. The nature of the proposed application that the grandparent wishes to make
  2. Their connection with the child
  3. Any risk there might be of the proposed application disrupting the child’s life to such an extent that it would harm the child

The court may also take into account any other factors they consider relevant.

If one or both parents raise objections, there is likely to be a full court hearing where all the parties can put forward their evidence. At this stage, it is extremely beneficial to have legal advice to assist with preparing the case,  to show to the court that grandparents have meaningful and ongoing relationships with their grandchildren, which significantly benefits their lives.

The court will always consider all the child’s circumstances, and will only make an order where they consider it better for the child than making no order at all. For example, they might have to weigh up the impact of contact with the child on other family relationships.

If you are a grandparent and would like to know more about your options or you are not happy with current arrangements regarding your grandchildren, please do not hesitate to contact our Family team on 020 3440 8000.

Related Services:
TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

TVE client obtains damages for unlawful disabled child policy

Our Services Contact Us

The London Borough of Haringey has agreed to pay substantial damages to a teenager with autism and his mother following a legal challenge. The family took Haringey to court under the Equality Act and Human Rights Act, after being denied a service for nearly a year. Despite repeated referrals and complaints from the family, the child’s school, his psychiatrist, the police and the family’s MP, Children’s Services refused to help. The basis for the council’s refusal was that the child was not “disabled” according to their policies. This meant that the Disabled Children’s team would not even assess the child, let alone provide him with an urgently needed care package. The result of this failure to provide a service was devastating for the family, with the police frequently being called out when the family could not cope. The child and his mother suffered emotional and physical harm.

After legal proceedings were started, Haringey accepted that their policies for assessing disabled children were directly discriminatory. They agreed to withdraw the policies Threshold Criteria for Disabled Children’ Services and Integrated Service Special Needs and Disabilities: Eligibility Criteria for Personal Budgets and to carry out a public consultation to develop new policies by January 2019.

As part of the settlement of the case, Haringey also agreed to carry out an audit of families which may have been affected by the unlawful policies by sampling 20% of referrals to the Disabled Children’s team made between January 2016 and January 2018. They agreed to contact families affected by the policies to let them know that they may have been eligible for services. Haringey also agreed to publish the findings of this audit by 31 October 2018 but, to date, the findings have not been published.

If you believe that your disabled child has been refused services by your local authority please contact our community care team on 020 3440 8100 or by email to a_communitycarereferrals@tvedwards.com

TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

Children and The Law: Holidays and Abduction

Our Services Contact Us

Following the breakdown of a relationship or marriage it is often the situation where one parent will want to take the children abroad during their school holidays. This article deals with what can be done if the children do not return from their holiday as planned.

Often at the end of a trip abroad, the children will return home, as anticipated, however, there are unfortunately situations where the travelling parent decides, without any consultation or agreement from the other parent, to retain the children in the foreign country. Such a decision might be deemed wrongful in the eyes of the law. This is because parents will often share parental responsibility for their children and therefore important decision concerning the children, such as where they live, should be made jointly, by both parents.

Where one parent acts alone and decides to retain the children abroad there are options available to the parent who has been left behind and it is important that specialist legal advice is sought at the earliest opportunity. The appropriate remedy will depend on the circumstances of the case including, the country the children live in normally and the country they have been retained in. This is as we may be able to rely on an international agreement, such as The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction or EU Law to achieve the swift return of the children to their home country.

There are also remedies available under English Law including applications made to the High Court in England and Wales to obtain orders that direct the other parent to return the children to their home country immediately or orders which can be placed before the court of the country the children have been taken to, to persuade them to assist with the return of the children to their home country.

In these cases it is often necessary to act swiftly to seek the return of your children and we at TV Edwards can advise you of your options regardless of whether you are based abroad and your children have been kept in England or Wales or if you are in England and Wales and your children have been taken abroad. We will offer you the support and advice that you need during what is often, an extremely difficult time.

At TV Edwards we have dedicated team of solicitors who specialise in advising parents in international children matters including preventing the abduction of children and the recovery of children who have been taken by one parent whether it be to another place within England and Wales, within the United Kingdom or internationally. If you have an international children law issue that you need assistance with then please do not hesitate to contact us on 0203 440 8000 or A_FamilyReferrals@tvedwards.com

Related Services:
TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

High Court Decision on EU Nationals Divorcing in England

Our Services Contact Us

A new legal authority has been published which clarifies when divorce proceedings can be started in England where the spouse starting the divorce has significant links to another EU country. While the position may change when the UK leaves the EU, there will be many international families that this affects in the intervening period and therefore family lawyers are taking great interest in this development, particularly because where a divorce takes place determines where financial matters between the couple are first resolved. 

The case of Pierburg v Pierburg involves a German couple living in Switzerland for tax purposes. The wife moved to England after their separation, having had a home here which she visited regularly for short periods, during the marriage. The judge followed the existing EU rules which say that she had to show she had lived in England for six or 12 months before she started her divorce proceedings. However, the judge decided that simply living in England is not sufficient, she must be habitually resident here, meaning that she must have established a fixed and enduring home which is the centre of their interests throughout the six or 12 month period. A person’s habitual residence does not have to be the only property they own or spend time in, but the amount of time they spend in that place compared to others is important. Their presence here cannot be “intermittent, transitory or decidedly temporary”.

The rules also provide that, if a spouse can only show they have been habitually resident in England for six months, as opposed to 12 months, they also have to show that England had become their permanent and settled home to the exclusion of anywhere else. This is known as “domicile” and it is up to the foreign national to prove that their domicile has changed to England from where it was held previously, which will most commonly be the country where they were born or grew up. 

In deciding these points judges look at practical indicators of an individual’s connections with, and intentions towards, a particular country. This can include where friends and family are located, where someone votes or sees their doctor. Every person’s circumstances are, of course, different. In Pierburg v Pierburg the judge decided the wife had not shown she had been habitually resident in England for the requisite period or that she was yet domiciled here. Therefore she could not divorce here and she must rely on the German jurisdiction because that is where she was found still to be domiciled. This is likely to have a significant and detrimental impact on the financial award she obtains from the divorce, although there is the possibility the English court could augment a German court’s financial decision by Mrs Pierburg arguing for a share of the capital assets built up during the marriage (providing she has not remarried in the meantime). 

These are very complex issues and the timescales involved are key. At the time a couple separates there are a myriad of emotional and practical considerations which can sometimes feel overwhelming. However, this new decision underlines that there are potentially fundamental ramifications for divorcees with international connections if they do not look ahead to how the legalities of the separation will be resolved and secure specialist support at a very early stage. 

Emma Baillie is the head of our Family Finance team which regularly advises in international cases. She has been described by the independent directory, Legal 500, as “well-liked by clients and very strong in cross-border matters”. 

Related Services:
TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

Consenting to Care

Our Services Contact Us

Consenting to Care?

Parents can agree to their children going into care, without going to court. Section 20 of the Children Act 1989 says that a local authority shall provide accommodation for any child in need within their area. Section 20 also sets out when that can happen.  This includes when parents cannot provide suitable accommodation or care for the child themselves.

That might happen when parents need a short, planned break from caring for a child (for instance a child with complex health needs). It could also happen if there has been a family crisis, and accommodating the child for a few weeks would help the family sort out their problems.

Strictly speaking, the local authority has to make sure parents do not object to their child being accommodated. It is good practice, however, for a local authority to make sure that parents actually agree to the child being accommodated.  If parents do object to the child being accommodated (and can arrange accommodation for the child themselves), the local authority cannot accommodate the child, without going to court for an order.  Parents might object from the start, or later on (even if they agreed to begin with).

The issue of parents’ agreement to section 20 accommodation, and what happens when parents no longer agree to their children being accommodated by a local authority, has recently come under the courts’ scrutiny.  

The Supreme Court is currently considering the law in relation to section 20, in the case of Williams v London Borough of Hackney, and you can see what happened at the hearing in February 2018 here –  https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2017-0037.html . This will be an important decision for families and children, because  the Supreme Court allowed a number of organisations, including the Family Rights Group, and the Association of Lawyers for Children,  to take part in the case. Those organisations have alerted the Supreme Court to the policy issues affecting everyone involved – local authorities, parents, and children. The Supreme Court’s decision is due later this year.

Press coverage last  week focused on another case, Herefordshire Council v AB [2018] EWFC 10 (available at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2018/10.html ) . The judge was highly critical of the local authority, Herefordshire Council, which had ‘voluntarily’ accommodated two children (from different families), one for eight years, the other for nine years (the whole of that child’s life). The judge said: ‘I have never before encountered two cases where a local authority has so seriously and serially failed to address the needs of the children in its care and so seriously misused, indeed abused, the provisions of section 20 of the Children Act 1989.’. He went on to say that, luckily, each children had ‘remained in the care of quite extraordinary and superlative carers who have met their respective needs extremely well’ The problem, however, was that there was no proper long term planning for either child. That included no proper thought about the parents’ involvement in their children’s lives. That had been damaging to both children.

It is crucial that parents know their rights, and take legal advice before agreeing to a child being accommodated by a local authority. At TV Edwards, we regularly advise clients on the use  – or misuse – of section 20.  We can help with talking to the local authority about any problems parents are facing, and how to deal with them. That includes looking at support to keep children with their families, as well as any need for short term section 20 accommodation. For instance, parents need to know, from the start, that  they can object to their child being accommodated. They also need to know that they  can change their minds, object to on-going accommodation, and demand the return of their child. If that happens, the local authority might then go to court for a care order, if there is a real risk of harm to a child – but the local authority would have to prove that to a judge, and would have to show that they are planning for the child’s longer term future.  Our experienced and specialist team will be happy to help if you have a query about section20 accommodation, or the involvement of children’s services with your family

TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

Taking a Child Abroad

Our Services Contact Us

What to Consider?

The Easter break is fast approaching and many families will be looking forward to spending time together. For some this might mean holidaying abroad.

If parents are separated, the arrangements for travelling abroad can be complicated and must be sorted out in well in advance. Each person with parental responsibility for the child must consent to the trip before the child travels abroad. Ideally, consent should be in writing to avoid any future disagreements about what was agreed. Additionally, you might be asked to provide the other parent’s written consent to travel abroad when you leave the UK, or upon arrival at the other country.

It is best if parents can agree arrangements in good time before any trip abroad, and have an agreed written record what has been decided. If you need consent but the other parent will not agree to the child travelling abroad, then you may need to apply for a court order to allow this.

If you apply for a court order, the judge will consider why the other parent is objecting to the child travelling. The most common worry is a fear that the child will not be returned home. The court will look for evidence that the child will be returned, such as return tickets. Ultimately, the judge decides what is in the child’s best interests and whether the child would benefit from the holiday.

If you are concerned that your child could be taken abroad and not returned home, then you can ask the court for a prohibited steps order. This is a court order that says the child must not be taken anywhere outside England and Wales. If the judge decides that there is a real risk that the child would not be returned home, then he or she can make a prohibited steps order preventing travel abroad. It is much better to have a prohibited steps order before a child travels, rather than have to go to court after the child has gone abroad, to try to make the other parent return the child home.

If you would like advice about taking your children abroad, or you are concerned about your children being taken abroad without your consent, please do get in touch with our accredited international children team on 0203 440 8000 or A_FamilyReferrals@tvedwards.com. We have a team of experienced solicitors who are able to offer specialist legal advice. 

Related Services:
TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

16 Days Of Activism

Our Services Contact Us

TV Edwards is pleased to support 16 Days of Activism, an international campaign to raise awareness and to work towards ending violence towards women and girls around the world. Every year the campaign runs from 25th November, the UN International Day of Elimination of Violence Against Women, to 10th December, Human Rights Day. 

The theme for the 2017 campaign is “Leave No One Behind: End Violence against Women and Girls” to reinforce the campaigns’ ultimate goal to eliminate violence towards women and girls. 

Domestic abuse disproportionately affects women and girls. As many as one in three women experience domestic abuse at some point in their lives and on average two women are killed by their partners every week.*  

Domestic abuse is any incident or pattern of incidents of controlling, coercive or threatening behaviour, violence or abuse between those who are or have been intimate partners or family members regardless of gender or sexuality.” This includes so called ‘honour’ based violence, Female Genital Mutilation and forced marriage. 

Domestic abuse can happen to anyone regardless of their personal circumstances. If you are concerned that you or someone you know has suffered or is at risk of suffering domestic abuse including forced marriage, so called ‘honour’ based violence FGM our accredited Domestic abuse solicitors can provide advice on all of the options open to you. For more information on specialist legal advice in relation to domestic abuse please click here.

TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

Cohabitation Awareness Week

Our Services Contact Us

Recent studies have shown that the cohabiting couple in the fastest growing family type in the UK having more than doubled over the past ten years and is now the second largest family type in the UK. Many couples now choose to cohabit rather than marry or cohabit before marriage or civil partnership.

These statistics highlight the need for cohabiting couples to be aware of their legal rights and if necessary take steps to protect these. Cohabiting couples do not have the same legal rights as married couples especially when it comes to property ownership, pension rights and maintenance payments.

According to the British Social Attitudes survey 51% of those surveyed believe that cohabiting couples are protected by common law marriage. Yet under current cohabitation law it is possible for a couple to live with someone for decades and have children together and then be offered little or no protection by the law when they separate.

The difference in legal rights between cohabiting and married couples may only really be felt during the breakdown of a relationship, but it is important for all cohabitees to think ahead and make sure that they are not left financially vulnerable in the event of a future separation.

If you are cohabiting or planning to cohabit there are steps which you can take:

  • Knowing your rights and seeking legal advice: the law is not designed for cohabitation, don’t make assumptions about how things would unfold
  • Drawing up an agreement with your partner, it is advisable for such an agreement to be drawn up before you cohabit, but it can be drawn up at any time after you have been living together
  • Both of you seeking advice on life insurance and making a will
  • Spreading the word to other people who you know in this situation so they can protect themselves

TV Edwards is supporting Resolution’s Cohabitation Awareness Week from 27th November to 1st December. The initiative is designed to help improve knowledge and information amongst the public at large so that cohabitees are better aware of what the law provides for them and what they can do to get more security. Our Family Finance team has accredited family law specialists with many years of experience advising cohabitees on separation including relating to finances and children. If you would like advice about cohabitation please contact us on 020 3440 8000 or by email to Charlotte.Kay@tvedwards.com

Related Services: