Nathaniel Gadsby - TV EDWARDS

Nathaniel Gadsby

← All People
Senior Associate Solicitor

About Nathaniel

Nathaniel joined TV Edwards in 2018 and qualified in 2021, before becoming a Senior Associate Solicitor in our Crime team. Nathaniel is also a Duty Solicitor and regularly attends the police station and Magistrates’ Court to represent clients. He deals with serious and complex crime, having represented clients accused of murder, firearms offences, sexual offences, fraud, serious violence and ‘County Lines’ drug conspiracies.

Nathaniel specialises in representing individuals with mental health issues; he has significant experience dealing with issues of fitness to plead, fitness to stand trial, non-insane automatism, the defence of insanity and partial defences to murder. Nathaniel also has a particular interest in representing children; he is aware of the catastrophic impact that criminal proceedings can have on youths and is always eager to persuade prosecuting authorities to consider out-of-court disposals where appropriate. He frequently provides clients with pre-charge advice, working tirelessly to seek to avoid prosecution.

Advises on following areas of law

Accreditations & Memberships

  • Police station accredited representative
  • Duty Solicitor
  • London Criminal Courts Solicitors’ Association

Notable Cases

Homicide/Firearms Offences:

  • R v M (Operation Crimpstar) – representation of a client prosecuted for the murder of his mother. Nathaniel represented the client from the police station, making representations and ensuring that he was not interviewed due to his mental health issues. Having obtained numerous psychiatric reports and reviewed the client’s medical records, Nathaniel was able to persuade the prosecution to accept a guilty plea to manslaughter by reason of diminished responsibility.
  • R v G (Operation Lomtrex) – ongoing representation of a client charged with attempted murder following the shooting of an alleged gang rival in Birmingham.
  • R v U – Nathaniel’s client instructed him having dispensed with previous legal representatives. The client was charged with aiding and abetting the causing of death by dangerous driving (having been a passenger in the vehicle in question during the fatal incident) and the case involved numerous complex legal arguments. An application to dismiss the charges was partially successful; one remaining charge proceeded to trial but the Judge dismissed that matter at the close of the prosecution case, agreeing with the defence’s half-time submissions.
  • Metropolitan Police v G – Nathaniel represented this client, accused of the murder of his girlfriend, at the police station. After engaging closely with mental health professionals to ensure the client was not interviewed due to his precarious mental health, the police ultimately took no further action against him.
  • R v R (Operation Cyclone) – ongoing representation of a client charged alongside four others with conspiring to sell firearms and ammunition. The prosecution rely on thousands of pages of communications data and cell site evidence; the trial is due to commence in November 2026.
  • Metropolitan Police v D – Nathaniel represented this client accused of the murder of her young son; in due course police took no further action against her.

Serious Violence:

  • R v S – Client initially arrested for the attempted murder of a police officer. He was eventually charged with causing grievous bodily harm, but was unanimously found not guilty by reason of insanity by a jury. Nathaniel worked tirelessly with a number of psychiatrists to ensure that the jury were made aware of the client’s significant mental health issues; the Court imposed a hospital order.
  • R v A – Nathaniel represented a vulnerable child who had refugee status, having fled Afghanistan following the Taliban’s takeover in 2021. The client was charged with causing grievous bodily harm with intent, having allegedly been involved in a large brawl in East London during which one male sustained twelve stab wounds. Nathaniel’s client was ultimately convicted of a lesser charge of affray, and avoided a custodial sentence.
  • R v W – Nathaniel represented a looked after child, charged with s18 causing grievous bodily harm with intent. The prosecution alleged that she had arranged for her co-defendants to stab the complainant following an online dispute. The client was ultimately acquitted of s18 at trial, whilst her co-defendants were convicted. She was found guilty of the lesser charge of s20 unlawful wounding, and sentenced to a Youth Rehabilitation Order, avoiding any time in prison.
  • R v S – Nathaniel’s client was charged with grievous bodily harm having stabbed a male in the face. Following extensive negotiation with the prosecution, the instruction of a psychologist and the provision of numerous character references, Nathaniel was able to secure a non-custodial sentence for the client.
  • R v M – Nathaniel acted for a City trader accused of a domestic assault. The prosecution offered no evidence at trial after the Court agreed with defence submissions regarding the admissibility of hearsay evidence.
  • R v L – Nathaniel represented a client who was charged with causing grievous bodily harm after police found him and a female covered in blood at his address. The client was alleged to have attacked her with a bottle; following negotiation with the prosecution Nathaniel’s client avoided a custodial sentence.
  • R v S – Nathaniel’s client was originally charged with attempting to cause grievous bodily harm. Following successful negotiation with the prosecutor at Court, the charge was reduced to assault occasioning actual bodily harm, and the client ultimately avoided a custodial sentence.

Fraud:

  • City of London Police v B – ongoing pre-charge representation of a former CEO of a government quango, accused of misconduct in public office, bribery and fraud offences. Nathaniel has represented the client in a number of lengthy interviews with officers from the Domestic Corruption Unit.
  • R v K (Operation Rissole) – Nathaniel’s client was accused of entering into a money laundering arrangement, contrary to the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. She was charged alongside nine other defendants following an alleged courier fraud targeting vulnerable elderly victims. Of the ten defendants, Nathaniel’s client was the only one to be acquitted at trial. The jury’s verdict was unanimous.
  • City of London Police v W – pre-charge representation of a company director accused of involvement in a vast conspiracy to defraud investors, currently valued at around £20 million. Nathaniel has made representations in relation to bail extensions and variations, as well as advising the client in advance of several very lengthy interviews with the Economic Crime Directorate. 

Drugs Offences:

  • R v E – Nathaniel represented this high-profile client investigated by the National Crime Agency and prosecuted for importing large quantities of cannabis from Thailand. The prosecution ultimately accepted a limited basis of plea which ensured that the client, having spent time on remand, served just a few more months in custody following the conclusion of the case.
  • R v A (Operation Knotweed) – Nathaniel represented a client, charged alongside 15 others, with a wide-ranging conspiracy to supply class A drugs in East London. After the commencement of the trial, following extensive negotiation with the prosecution, the client pleaded guilty to being concerned in the supply of drugs on just four individual dates. The client ultimately received a suspended sentence.
  • R v R – Representation of a client charged alongside five others with conspiring to import significant quantities of cocaine from the Netherlands.
  • R v H – Representation of a client charged with drug supply offences; following a trial at the Old Bailey the client was acquitted of all charges against him.
  • R v A – Client charged with supplying class A drugs. The defence made an application to dismiss the charges, on the basis of numerous flaws and inconsistencies in the investigation against the client. Following a Crown Court judge’s endorsement of the concerns raised, the prosecution conceded the application and offered no evidence against Nathaniel’s client.

Education & Qualifications

  • LLB – University of Exeter
  • LPC LLM in Professional Legal Practice – University of Law

Professional Memberships / Panels / Associations / Accreditations

  • Committee member of London Criminal Courts Solicitors’ Association (LCCSA)
  • Police station and duty accredited

Recommendations:

My family and I are extremely pleased with the support we received from our solicitors Nathaniel Gadsby and Richard Grace at TV Edwards LLP. I highly recommend their services, you won’t regret it.
— Joaniza and Manuel 15.03.26
Professional, Patient, and Great to Work With – OutstandingNathaniel was extremely helpful and professional throughout my case. I really appreciated how clearly he explained each step and kept things moving. His communication was always timely, reassuring, and detailed, and he handled everything with great care. His calm, professional approach made what could have been a slow and difficult process feel steady, methodical, and far easier than trying to manage it alone. I’m genuinely grateful for his help and would happily recommend him and TV Edwards to anyone needing legal support.
— Casey 27.10.25
Outstanding Legal Support and Guidance I had an excellent experience working with Nathaniel Gadsby. He was highly professional and thorough, always keeping me informed throughout my case. His guidance and expertise led to a positive outcome, and I felt fully supported at every stage.I’m very grateful to Nathaniel for helping me through such a stressful time. He explained everything clearly, was easy to contact, and responded promptly to my questions. I highly recommend him and have every confidence anyone who works with him will be in the best hands. Thank you, Nathaniel!
— Kieran 18.09.25
Highly recommendedI would like to say big thank you to Nathaniel for his support in a very difficult situation. Nathaniel is very kind and understanding person with great knowledge and he took time to explain everything to us. Thanks to Nathaniel professionalism and expertise, we had the best possible outcome and the case was closed. We are very grateful and would highly recommend Nathaniel.
— Lucas 15.09.25
Had an amazing experience. Both solicitors Georgia and Nathaniel went above and beyond to ensure I had a good outcome despite an unpleasant situation
— Aminah 13.07.24
Many thanks to Nathaniel for your excellent work on my behalf. You were so thorough, persistent, fair and transparent. I shall always say, “I had the best possible solicitor” to fight my cause. Thank you so much for the hard work and your patience afforded to me through a difficult time. Your support and kindness I shall always remember with much gratitude.
— Client
I cannot express enough gratitude for the outstanding service I received from Nathaniel and TV EDWARDS LLP. Their professionalism, expertise, and commitment to excellence are unmatched. If you are in need of legal representation, I wholeheartedly recommend TV EDWARDS LLP and Nathaniel. They will go above and beyond to ensure your needs are met and your expectations exceeded.
— Client
What truly set TV EDWARDS LLP and Nathaniel apart was their dedication to achieving the best possible outcome for me. Nathaniel’s knowledge of the law and strategic approach to my case were impressive. He fought tirelessly on my behalf, leaving no room for doubt that my interests were his top priority.
— Client
Throughout the entire process, Nathaniel displayed exceptional communication skills. He kept me informed and updated at every step, ensuring that I was well-informed and reassured. Any questions or concerns I had were promptly addressed, and his calm and patient demeanor made the entire process stress-free.
— Client
Many thanks to Nathaniel for your excellent work on my behalf. You were so thorough, persistent, fair and transparent. I shall always say, “I had the best possible solicitor” to fight my cause. Thank you so much for the hard work and your patience afforded to me through a difficult time. Your support and kindness I shall always remember with much gratitude.
— Zia 31.10.24
I hold Nathaniel Gadsby in the highest regard for his professionalism, kindness, and welcoming nature. He is a truly compassionate individual who treats everyone with respect and without judgment. His support extended not only to me but also to my entire family, and we are incredibly grateful for the way he handled our case. Thanks to his exceptional work, I was able to avoid the devastating consequences of becoming homeless, and my family was spared further distress. We deeply appreciate Nathaniel’s unwavering support and professionalism. My family and I will continue to keep him in our thoughts and prayers for the significant role he played in helping us through this difficult time. I wholeheartedly recommend TV Edwards and their team to anyone in need of legal assistance. The solicitors at TV Edwards, particularly Nathaniel Gadsby are highly qualified professionals who should not be underestimated. Thank you once again, Nathaniel
— Client, 29.01.25
A fantastic experience with Nathaniel Gadsby at TV Edwards Solicitors. They demonstrated exceptional knowledge of criminal law, providing clear and concise explanations throughout my case, which put my mind at ease during a stressful time. Their dedication to achieving the best possible outcome was evident, and they were always available to answer questions and address concerns. I would highly recommend them to anyone facing criminal charges
— David 31.01.25
Meet Nathaniel's team
Alcohol and Entertainment Licensing Criminal Defence
Contact Us
020 3440 8000 enquiries@tvedwards.com Our Offices Contact Us