Your browser is out of date or unsupported. As a result, some elements of this website may not be fully functional. For the best possible user experience, it is recommended that you use the latest version of Chrome, Firefox or Microsoft Edge.
TV Edwards Solicitors Logo
Call us on: 020 3440 8000
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Awards and Accreditations
    • Corporate and Social Responsibility
    • Cybercrime and Fraud Warning
    • Make a Secure Payment
    • Our London Offices
    • Pricing
    • What Our Clients Say
    • Case Studies
  • Services
    • You & Your Family You & Your Family
      • Community Care Solicitors
      • Court Of Protection Solicitors
      • Criminal Defence Solicitors
      • Dispute Resolution Solicitors
      • Family Law
      • Personal Injury Claims
      • Wills And Probate Solicitors
    • You & Your Property You & Your Property
      • Housing Solicitors
      • Property Disputes
      • Residential Property
    • You & Your Business You & Your Business
      • Alcohol & Entertainment Licensing
      • Business Crime Solicitors
      • Commercial Litigation for Complex Cases
      • Commercial Property Solicitors
    • _
  • Our People
    • Alcohol and Entertainment Licensing
    • Community Care
    • Court of Protection
    • Criminal Defence
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Family Law
    • Housing
    • Partners and Management Team
    • Personal Injury
    • Property
    • Wills and Probate
  • News and Blogs
  • Careers
TV Edwards Solicitors Logo
  • Welcome to TV Edwards Solicitors
  • You & Your Family
    • Family and Children Law
    • Wills And Probate Solicitors
    • Personal Injury Claims
    • Dispute Resolution Solicitors
    • Mental Health Solicitors
    • Court Of Protection Solicitors
    • Community Care Solicitors
    • Criminal Defence Solicitors
  • You & Your Property
    • Residential Property
    • Property Disputes
    • Housing Solicitors
  • You & Your Business
    • Commercial Property Solicitors
    • Commercial Litigation for Complex Cases
    • Business Crime Solicitors
    • Alcohol & Entertainment Licensing
  • About Us
    • Our London Offices
    • What Our Clients Say
    • Pricing
    • Make a Secure Payment
    • Awards and Accreditations
    • Case Studies
  • Our People
    • Community Care
    • Court of Protection
    • Criminal Defence
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Family Law
    • Housing
    • Alcohol and Entertainment Licensing
    • Mental Health
    • Partners and Management Team
    • Personal Injury
    • Wills and Probate
    • Property
    • Support Team
  • News and Blogs
  • Careers
Call us on: 020 3440 8000
×
  • Divorce Solicitors
    • Divorce process
    • Finances
    • Civil partnerships
    • Child arrangements
  • Child Law Solicitors
    • Child arrangements
    • Social services
    • Adoption Solicitors
    • Special guardianship
    • Child Relocation Solicitors
    • Child Abduction Solicitors
  • Modern Parenting
    • Surrogacy
    • Fertility
    • Donor conception
    • Co-parenting
    • Adoption Solicitors
  • Unmarried couples
    • Pre nups, post nups and pre partnership agreements
    • Cohabitation agreements
    • Separation
    • Finances for children
  • Domestic abuse
    • Domestic abuse
    • Forced marriage
    • FGM
×

Start typing to search.

    ×
    TV Edwards Solicitors Logo

    020 3440 8000

    enquiries@tvedwards.com

    Our Offices

    TV Edwards Solicitors Logo

    020 3440 8000

    enquiries@tvedwards.com

    Our Offices

    Contact Us

    Please enter your first name(s).
    Please enter your surname.
    Please enter a valid email address.
    Please enter your contact number.
    Please select an option.
    Please enter a message.

    We’ll only use this information to handle your enquiry and we won’t share it with any third parties. For more details see our Privacy Policy.

    TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

    Family Court Transparency: Naming Judges in the Sara Sharif Case

    The call for accountability and openness in family law has never been stronger.

    Back to News & Blogs 21st February 2025

    Sarah Inchley
    Sarah Inchley
    Partner

    Blog Children Law Domestic Violence Family

    Ten-year-old Sara Sharif was tragically murdered by her father, Urfan Sharif, and stepmother, Beinash Batool, in August 2023. Her death has garnered widespread attention, due to the brutality she suffered at the hands of those who should have cared for her. Sara was placed under a Child Protection Plan from birth due to concerns about the risks posed by her parents – concerns that would resurface throughout her short life. As a result, Sara was the subject of three family court cases in 2021, 2014 and 2019 where Sara and her parents were assessed by professionals who would provide evidence to the court. The decisions of three judges would shape Sara’s life – they ordered that she spend various periods of time in foster care, her mother’s care and ultimately, her father’s care.

    The tragic circumstances of Sara’s death raise critical questions: how could a child, known to multiple child protection professionals and involved in three family court cases, be subjected to such a horrific fate? The answers may lie in the media examining and reporting on the historic court documents to enable the public to scrutinise decisions made.

    The process of the media reporting on these court documents, along with revealing the names of the professionals and judges involved, has sparked a legal battle. This unfolds against the backdrop of a movement advocating for greater transparency in the family courts.

    For many years, the family courts have operated with significant restrictions on the media reporting any information about a case involving children because of their privacy. Historically, therefore, the family court system has been opaque, leading to public accusations of ‘secret’ justice.

    In recent years, there has been a sea change towards greater transparency. Following a pilot project, since 27 January 2025, open reporting provisions now apply to all family courts in England and Wales. This means that journalists and legal bloggers can report on what they see and hear in family courts with a transparency order protecting the anonymity of children and their families.

    It is in this context that journalists Louise Tickle and Hannah Summers, along with nine big name media parties, applied to the High Court to report upon the historic court cases relating to Sara. They said that there was an overwhelming public interest in understanding how Sara came to be placed in her father’s care and the effectiveness of safeguarding procedures and so full details should be reported upon including the names of the professionals and judges involved.

    Mr Justice Williams heard the case on 9 December 2024 on the cusp of the verdict being given in the criminal trial of Sharif and Batool. He balanced Article 8 rights to respect for private and family life (particularly those of the children) and the Article 10 freedom of expression rights of the media. He concluded that he would allow the media parties to see and report upon many historic case papers subject to restrictions keeping the names, ages and protected characteristics of Sara’s siblings confidential.

    He ruled however that there be no reporting of any third party including social workers, guardians and judges. Was that decision just?

    He had intended to reconsider the issue of the anonymity of judges in March 2025 when the judges themselves had been notified. The media parties however immediately appealed to the Court of Appeal saying that the naming of judges is a matter of exceptionally high constitutional and public importance and that Mr Justice Williams’ decision was a derogation from the principle of open justice.

    The Court of Appeal considered: did the High Court have the power to anonymise the judges’ identities? Was the decision procedurally irregular? For example, there was no evidence that the judges would be harmed. Finally, was Mr Justice Williams biased against the media?

    The Court of Appeal concluded that Mr Justice Williams was wrong, and his decision could not stand. He had no powers to make the anonymity order he did, and his decision was procedurally flawed. He was heavily criticised for getting ‘carried away’ – using his own experiences to create a case for anonymising the judges rather than on the law and the evidence. He behaved unfairly to the journalists in finding that their reporting to date had been inaccurate and irresponsible and that his sarcastic remarks about the media had no proper place in a court judgment.

    The Court of Appeal said that the judge had lost sight of the importance of press scrutiny in upholding the integrity of the justice system and that the historic judges must be named, allowing 7 days for them to prepare and to protect themselves from potential harm.

    The landmark shift in transparency in family courts comes at a pivotal moment: the same week that the identities of judges responsible for the historic decisions for Sara Sherif have been revealed.

    As of 10am on Friday 31 January the judges were named as HHJ Raeside, HHJ Nathan and HHJ Williams.

    Sara’s heartbreaking story intertwines with core legal principles of open justice. The message is clear: judges’ decisions affecting children must be subject to scrutiny and their identities known.

    The call for accountability and openness in family law has never been stronger.

    This article was first published in The Law Gazette on 13 February 2025.

    Disclaimer: The information on the TV Edwards website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication.

    Related Services:

    Family Law Solicitors
    Child Law Solicitors
    Domestic Abuse & Violence Solicitors

    More Articles

    Article Image

    EPC changes and what they mean for Landlords

    6th May 2025
    Article Image

    Freezing Injunctions in the UK: When and How to Secure One

    7th April 2025
    Article Image

    TV Edwards LLP Strengthens Leadership with Six New Member Partners

    2nd April 2025
    Article Image

    Bitcoin and NFTs have complicated asset division on divorce

    1st April 2025
    Article Image

    Pensions, Divorce, and the CETV Conundrum

    26th March 2025
    Article Image

    Defending the Foreign Enforcement of a Judgment in the UK

    25th March 2025
    All Articles 

    Contact Us

    020 3440 8000|enquiries@tvedwards.com|Our Offices

    020 3440 8000
    enquiries@tvedwards.com
    Our Offices
    Contact Us

    The Legal 500 2025 Leading Firm
    Chambers 2025 Top Ranked
    The Sunday Times best place to work 2024 logo
    The Times Best Law Firms 2025
    Cyber Essentials Accreditation Logo
    Lexcel Logo
    Lexcel Logo

    © 2025 TV Edwards LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (465533) and is a Limited Liability Partnership registered in England and Wales number OC325696. Details of the SRA Code of Conduct can be found at sra.org.uk. Registered name: TV Edwards LLP. Registered Office: 35-37 Mile End Road, London, E1 4TP.

    TV Edwards Solicitors Logo

    Contact Us

    Call us on: 020 3440 8000

    Our Offices


    • Quick Links
      • Pricing
      • Pay Online
      • Careers with TV Edwards
    • Insights
      • Blogs
      • Case Studies
    • Regulatory
      • Legal Disclaimer
      • Terms of Business
      • Accessibility
      • Privacy Policy – Website Users
      • Privacy Policy – General
      • Cookies
      • Complaints Procedure

    Find us on:


    TV Edwards Solicitors Logo
    © 2022 TV Edwards LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (465533) and is a Limited Liability Partnership registered in England and Wales number OC325696. Details of the SRA Code of Conduct can be found at sra.org.uk. Registered name: TV Edwards LLP. Registered Office: 35-37 Mile End Road, London, E1 4TP.
    Use of Cookies

    Our website requires the use of cookies. Enabling all cookies makes sure the website works as smoothly as possible, and also helps us to improve it. Some cookies are activated by default but tracking cookies aren't switched on without your consent.

    For our full policy, visit our cookies page.


    Using this tool will set a cookie on your device to remember your preferences.

    Necessary

    Necessary cookies enable core functionality of the website, including security, SRA Regulationand reCAPTCHA form verifications. It is possible to disable these cookies in your browser settings, but this could affect the functionality of the website.


    Recommended
    Off On

    Recommended cookies improve your experience of our site by helping to display our latest client reviews and embedded maps of our office locations. You can find full details on Google's privacy policy here.


    Analytics
    Off On

    We'd like to use analytics services provided by Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity and Ruler Analytics to collect anonymous information from our visitors. The data we collect will help us to improve our website and services. Learn more about how we use these services and our commitment to safeguarding data in our Cookie Policy.

    Settings Save & Close
    020 3440 8000