Your browser is out of date or unsupported. As a result, some elements of this website may not be fully functional. For the best possible user experience, it is recommended that you use the latest version of Chrome, Firefox or Microsoft Edge.
TV Edwards Solicitors Logo
Call us on: 020 3440 8000
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Awards and Accreditations
    • Corporate and Social Responsibility
    • Cybercrime and Fraud Warning
    • Make a Secure Payment
    • Our London Offices
    • Pricing
    • What Our Clients Say
    • Case Studies
  • Services
    • You & Your Family You & Your Family
      • Community Care Solicitors
      • Court Of Protection Solicitors
      • Criminal Defence Solicitors
      • Dispute Resolution Solicitors
      • Family Law
      • Personal Injury Claims
      • Wills And Probate Solicitors
    • You & Your Property You & Your Property
      • Housing Solicitors
      • Property Disputes
      • Residential Property
    • You & Your Business You & Your Business
      • Alcohol & Entertainment Licensing
      • Business Crime Solicitors
      • Commercial Litigation for Complex Cases
      • Commercial Property Solicitors
    • _
  • Our People
    • Alcohol and Entertainment Licensing
    • Community Care
    • Court of Protection
    • Criminal Defence
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Family Law
    • Housing
    • Partners and Management Team
    • Personal Injury
    • Property
    • Wills and Probate
  • News and Blogs
  • Careers
TV Edwards Solicitors Logo
  • Welcome to TV Edwards Solicitors
  • You & Your Family
    • Family and Children Law
    • Wills And Probate Solicitors
    • Personal Injury Claims
    • Dispute Resolution Solicitors
    • Mental Health Solicitors
    • Court Of Protection Solicitors
    • Community Care Solicitors
    • Criminal Defence Solicitors
  • You & Your Property
    • Residential Property
    • Property Disputes
    • Housing Solicitors
  • You & Your Business
    • Commercial Property Solicitors
    • Commercial Litigation for Complex Cases
    • Business Crime Solicitors
    • Alcohol & Entertainment Licensing
  • About Us
    • Our London Offices
    • What Our Clients Say
    • Pricing
    • Make a Secure Payment
    • Awards and Accreditations
    • Case Studies
  • Our People
    • Community Care
    • Court of Protection
    • Criminal Defence
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Family Law
    • Housing
    • Alcohol and Entertainment Licensing
    • Mental Health
    • Partners and Management Team
    • Personal Injury
    • Wills and Probate
    • Property
    • Support Team
  • News and Blogs
  • Careers
Call us on: 020 3440 8000
×
  • Divorce Solicitors
    • Divorce process
    • Finances
    • Civil partnerships
    • Child arrangements
  • Child Law Solicitors
    • Child arrangements
    • Social services
    • Adoption Solicitors
    • Special guardianship
    • Child Relocation Solicitors
    • Child Abduction Solicitors
  • Modern Parenting
    • Surrogacy
    • Fertility
    • Donor conception
    • Co-parenting
    • Adoption Solicitors
  • Unmarried couples
    • Pre nups, post nups and pre partnership agreements
    • Cohabitation agreements
    • Separation
    • Finances for children
  • Domestic abuse
    • Domestic abuse
    • Forced marriage
    • FGM
×

Start typing to search.

    ×
    TV Edwards Solicitors Logo

    020 3440 8000

    enquiries@tvedwards.com

    Our Offices

    TV Edwards Solicitors Logo

    020 3440 8000

    enquiries@tvedwards.com

    Our Offices

    Contact Us

    Please enter your first name(s).
    Please enter your surname.
    Please enter a valid email address.
    Please enter your contact number.
    Please select an option.
    Please enter a message.

    We’ll only use this information to handle your enquiry and we won’t share it with any third parties. For more details see our Privacy Policy.

    TV EDWARDS SOLICITORS LLP

    Important Court of Appeal Guidance on notification of fathers and extended family in adoption proceedings

    The Court of Appeal handed down judgment on 29 January 2020 in the case A, B and C (Adoption: Notification of...

    default

    Back to News & Blogs 7th February 2020

    Claire Longland
    Claire Longland
    Senior Associate Solicitor

    Blog Family Modern Parenting, S...

    The Court of Appeal handed down judgment on 29 January 2020 in the case A, B and C (Adoption: Notification of Fathers and Relatives) [2020] EWCA Civ 41. This judgement provided important clarification on the contentious issue of when fathers and extended family members should be notified by the local authority and the Court of the plans for a child in the face of opposition from the mother. The Court heard appeals in three cases where the mothers had concealed their pregnancy and did not wish for others to be informed of the baby’s existence or the court proceedings for various reasons. In all cases adoption was a potential option for the child and in two of the cases the mother agreed to the adoption of the child.

    The case was heard by The President of the Family Division, Lord Justice Peter Jackson and Lady Justice Nicola Davies. The lead judgement was given by Lord Justice Peter Jackson who acknowledged that such decisions are extremely difficult and personal.

    Respect is due to the position of any mother who goes through pregnancy without family support and then chooses to relinquish the child at birth in the belief that it is for the best. Respect is also due to the position of the unsuspecting relatives. Some may have been a fleeting presence in the mother’s life, but others may be more significant figures who have been kept in the dark and would be astonished to find that a baby (their child, sibling or grandchild) had been born and adopted without their knowledge, particularly if they were in a position to put themselves forward as carers. Most of all, the notification decision has life-changing implications for the baby. It may influence whether adoption happens at all and, even if it does, a sound adoption has its foundations in the integrity of the process by which it is achieved.

    For social workers and courts these are not easy decisions. They have to be made without delay, on incomplete information, and in the knowledge of the profound consequences for everyone concerned. The law aims to distinguish those cases where a ‘fast-track’ adoption without notification of relatives is lawful from the majority of cases where the profound significance of the decision for the child demands that any realistic alternatives to adoption are given proper consideration. But in the end each case is unique and the outcome must depend on the facts.”

    Jackson LJ determined that the “welfare of the child, though relevant, is not the paramount consideration when making a decision as to who should be notified of the proposal for the child to be adopted”. He considered that the decision was not one “relating to the upbringing of a child” (CA 1989) or “relating to the adoption of a child” (ACA 2002) but a decision about who should be consulted about such a decision. Thus, while child welfare, prompt decision-making and a comprehensive review of every relevant factor, including those mentioned in the checklists, are all central to the notification decision, the decision is not one that is formally governed by the provisions of s.1 of the CA 1989 or of the ACA 2002 and the welfare of the child is not the paramount consideration of the local authority and the court in this context”

    Jackson LJ went on to provide a helpful and comprehensive guide as to the approach to be taken in such cases:

    “1. The law allows for ‘fast-track’ adoption with the consent of all those with parental responsibility, so in some cases the mother alone. Where she opposes notification being given to the child’s father or relatives her right to respect for her private life is engaged and can only be infringed where it is necessary to do so to protect the interests of others.

    2. The profound importance of the adoption decision for the child and potentially for other family members is clearly capable of supplying a justification for overriding the mother’s request. Whether it does so will depend upon the individual circumstances of the case.

    3. The decision should be prioritised and the process characterised by urgency and thoroughness.

    4. The decision-maker’s first task is to establish the facts as clearly as possible, mindful of the often limited and one-sided nature of the information available. The confidential relinquishment of a child for adoption is an unusual event and the reasons for it must be respectfully scrutinised so that the interests of others are protected. In fairness to those other individuals, the account that is given by the person seeking confidentiality cannot be taken at face value. All information that can be discovered without compromising confidentiality should therefore be gathered and a first-hand account from the person seeking confidentiality will normally be sought. The investigation should enable broad conclusions to be drawn about the relative weight to be given to the factors that must inform the decision.

    5. Once the facts have been investigated the task is to strike a fair balance between the various interests involved. The welfare of the child is an important factor but it is not the paramount consideration.

    6. There is no single test for distinguishing between cases in which notification should and should not be given but the case law shows that these factors will be relevant when reaching a decision:

    (1) Parental responsibility. The fact that a father has parental responsibility by marriage or otherwise entitles him to give or withhold consent to adoption and gives him automatic party status in any proceedings that might lead to adoption. Compelling reasons are therefore required before the withholding of notification can be justified.

    (2) Article 8 rights. Whether the father, married or unmarried, or the relative have an established or potential family life with the mother or the child, the right to a fair hearing is engaged and strong reasons are required before the withholding of notification can be justified.

    (3) The substance of the relationships. Aside from the presence or absence of parental responsibility and of family life rights, an assessment must be made of the substance of the relationship between the parents, the circumstances of the conception, and the significance of relatives. The purpose is to ensure that those who are necessarily silent are given a notional voice so as to identify the possible strengths and weaknesses of any argument that they might make. Put another way, with what degree of objective justification might such a person complain if they later discovered they had been excluded from the decision? The answer will differ as between a father with whom the mother has had a fleeting encounter and one with whom she has had a substantial relationship, and as between members of the extended family who are close to the parents and those who are more distant.

    (4) The likelihood of a family placement being a realistic alternative to adoption. This is of particular importance to the child’s lifelong welfare as it may determine whether or not adoption is necessary. An objective view, going beyond the say-so of the person seeking confidentiality, should be taken about whether a family member may or may not be a potential carer. Where a family placement is unlikely to be worth investigating or where notification may cause significant harm to those notified, this factor will speak in favour of maintaining confidentiality; anything less than that and it will point the other way.

    (5) The physical, psychological or social impact on the mother or on others of notification being given. Where this would be severe, for example because of fear arising from rape or violence, or because of possible consequences such as ostracism or family breakdown, or because of significant mental health vulnerability, these must weigh heavily in the balancing exercise. On the other hand, excessive weight should not be given to short term difficulties and to less serious situations involving embarrassment or social unpleasantness, otherwise the mother’s wish would always prevail at the expense of other interests.

    (6) Cultural and religious factors. The conception and concealed pregnancy may give rise to particular difficulties in some cultural and religious contexts. These may enhance the risks of notification, but they may also mean that the possibility of maintaining the birth tie through a family placement is of particular importance for the child.

    (7) The availability and durability of the confidential information. Notification can only take place if there is someone to notify. In cases where a mother declines to identify a father she may face persuasion, if that is thought appropriate, but she cannot be coerced. In some cases the available information may mean that the father is identifiable, and maternal relatives may also be identifiable. The extent to which identifying information is pursued is a matter of judgement. Conversely, there will be cases where it is necessary to consider whether any confidentiality is likely to endure. In the modern world secrets are increasingly difficult to keep and the consequences, particularly for the child and any prospective adopters, of the child’s existence being concealed but becoming known to family members later on, sometimes as a result of disclosure by the person seeking confidentiality, should be borne in mind.

    (8) The impact of delay. A decision to apply to court and thereafter any decision to notify will inevitably postpone to some extent the time when the child’s permanent placement can be confirmed. In most cases, the importance of the issues means that the delay cannot be a predominant factor. There may however be circumstances where delay would have particularly damaging consequences for the mother or for the child; for example, it would undoubtedly need to be taken into account if it would lead to the withdrawal of the child’s established carers or to the loss of an especially suitable adoptive placement.

    (9) Any other relevant matters. The list of relevant factors is not closed. Mothers may have many reasons for wishing to maintain confidentiality and there may be a wide range of implications for the child, the father and for other relatives. All relevant matters must be considered.

    7. It has rightly been said that the maintenance of confidentiality is exceptional, and highly exceptional where a father has parental responsibility or where there is family life under Article 8. However exceptionality is not in itself a test or a short cut; rather it is a reflection of the fact that the profound significance of adoption for the child and considerations of fairness to others means that the balance will often fall in favour of notification. But the decision on whether confidentiality should be maintained can only be made by striking a fair balance between the factors that are present in the individual case.”

    This case provides a helpful reminder of the importance of addressing the issue of notification at an early stage and carefully considering the approach based on the specific facts of the case. It will be very unusual for a father not to be notified but in some circumstances it will be appropriate to maintain confidentiality based on the application of the above test.

    The full Judgment can be found here: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2020/41.html

    Claire Longland

    Our experienced and specialist team will be happy to help if you have a query about  the involvement of children’s services with your family, please do not hesitate to contact our Family team on 020 3440 8020.

    Related Services:

    Family Law Solicitors
    Fertility Law Solicitors

    More Articles

    Article Image

    EPC changes and what they mean for Landlords

    6th May 2025
    Article Image

    Freezing Injunctions in the UK: When and How to Secure One

    7th April 2025
    Article Image

    TV Edwards LLP Strengthens Leadership with Six New Member Partners

    2nd April 2025
    Article Image

    Bitcoin and NFTs have complicated asset division on divorce

    1st April 2025
    Article Image

    Pensions, Divorce, and the CETV Conundrum

    26th March 2025
    Article Image

    Defending the Foreign Enforcement of a Judgment in the UK

    25th March 2025
    All Articles 

    Contact Us

    020 3440 8000|enquiries@tvedwards.com|Our Offices

    020 3440 8000
    enquiries@tvedwards.com
    Our Offices
    Contact Us

    The Legal 500 2025 Leading Firm
    Chambers 2025 Top Ranked
    The Sunday Times best place to work 2024 logo
    The Times Best Law Firms 2025
    Cyber Essentials Accreditation Logo
    Lexcel Logo
    Lexcel Logo

    © 2025 TV Edwards LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (465533) and is a Limited Liability Partnership registered in England and Wales number OC325696. Details of the SRA Code of Conduct can be found at sra.org.uk. Registered name: TV Edwards LLP. Registered Office: 35-37 Mile End Road, London, E1 4TP.

    TV Edwards Solicitors Logo

    Contact Us

    Call us on: 020 3440 8000

    Our Offices


    • Quick Links
      • Pricing
      • Pay Online
      • Careers with TV Edwards
    • Insights
      • Blogs
      • Case Studies
    • Regulatory
      • Legal Disclaimer
      • Terms of Business
      • Accessibility
      • Privacy Policy – Website Users
      • Privacy Policy – General
      • Cookies
      • Complaints Procedure

    Find us on:


    TV Edwards Solicitors Logo
    © 2022 TV Edwards LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (465533) and is a Limited Liability Partnership registered in England and Wales number OC325696. Details of the SRA Code of Conduct can be found at sra.org.uk. Registered name: TV Edwards LLP. Registered Office: 35-37 Mile End Road, London, E1 4TP.
    Use of Cookies

    Our website requires the use of cookies. Enabling all cookies makes sure the website works as smoothly as possible, and also helps us to improve it. Some cookies are activated by default but tracking cookies aren't switched on without your consent.

    For our full policy, visit our cookies page.


    Using this tool will set a cookie on your device to remember your preferences.

    Necessary

    Necessary cookies enable core functionality of the website, including security, SRA Regulationand reCAPTCHA form verifications. It is possible to disable these cookies in your browser settings, but this could affect the functionality of the website.


    Recommended
    Off On

    Recommended cookies improve your experience of our site by helping to display our latest client reviews and embedded maps of our office locations. You can find full details on Google's privacy policy here.


    Analytics
    Off On

    We'd like to use analytics services provided by Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity and Ruler Analytics to collect anonymous information from our visitors. The data we collect will help us to improve our website and services. Learn more about how we use these services and our commitment to safeguarding data in our Cookie Policy.

    Settings Save & Close
    020 3440 8000